tpo 35
In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M. Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book (manuscript) written on vellum (vellum is a material that was used for writing before the introduction of paper). The “Voynich manuscript,” as it became known, resembles manuscripts written in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. However, it is written in a completely unknown script. To date, no one has been able to decode the script and understand the book’s content. Several theories have been proposed to explain the origin of the Voynich manuscript.
The reading and lecture are both about a Voynich manuscript which was used before the paper. The author of the reading notes that since no one could decode the script, understand the written document and proposed several theories of the origin of the manuscript. The lecturer challenged the claims made by the author. He is on the opinion that none of the three probably the author of the script.
To begin with, the author argues that the scientific, magical document was found in the script which is very close to Ascham’s book on medicinal plants. The article also mentions that Anthony Ascham was a physician and botanist, had been claimed as a possible author. The specific argument challenged by the lecturer. He claims that Anthony Ascham is an ordinary scientist and works mainly on to collect the picture of the plants from a different resource. He also states that the information conveyed is superficial not the magical code.
Second, the writer suggests that Kelley may be the author of the book because he used to make a random character to sell the noble for the money. He adds that the document looks like the magical but with the unnecessary text. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that the book was created with proper care. Moreover, the sixteenth centuries people are not so much smart as modern people and Kelley has not created those alphabets for only sells.
Third, the author posits that Wilfrid M. Voynich was created that book who is an antique book dealer and have knowledge of the old manuscript to sell the book as a mysterious book. In contrast, the lecturer position is that the vellum and ink are used in this book is 400 years ago. Additionally, he states it is impossible to make a copy of the ink that is 400 years old.
- If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience. 50
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own."; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning." 33
- tpo33Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of |locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types of stone; most are about 70 75
- Two years ago, the town of Ocean View built a new municipal golf course and resort hotel.During the past two years, tourism in Ocean View has increased, new businesses haveopened there, and Ocean View's tax revenues have risen by 30 percent. The best 50
- People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...eories of the origin of the manuscript. The lecturer challenged the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 13, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... copy of the ink that is 400 years old.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, third, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80258899676 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49934585759 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517799352751 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8192752159 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2941176471 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1764705882 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189188633383 0.272083759551 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540498185467 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071587592417 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110038699682 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532637249156 0.0443174109184 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.