In the past, university students had to go to lectures because this was the only way to teach large numbers of people. Thanks to technology, students no longer need to be taught this way.
To what extent do you agree?
Professors have lectured for centuries however technological advances and other forms of teaching have emerged and improved the quality of knowledge. From my point of view, the education system has become interactive since the internet spread and has innovated the teaching method with new resources.
online practices have been part of young people's lives since birth and assumed to be a basic condition of modern life offering besides entertainment, a variety of benefits in the educational sphere. From this perspective, using the internet in the classroom gets students more excited about learning due to activities are often interactive, thus they get the chance to directly engage with information rather than passively listen to lectures. A good example is million of educational videos produced by individual educators and learners offered by Youtube EDU service.
Similarly, as classroom technology and online courses have become more prevalent and advanced, teachers and students alike have new ways to study, plan activities, and present information. As a result of the advantages of internet educational growth, has emerged a range of resources like online classes, interactive teaching, and simplified research methods. These new technologies are also, ironically, bringing out the importance of oral persuasion. so, online speeches as TED talks and so forth have sparked new interest in cultivating oratory skills.
To conclude, the internet is a growing contribution to what means to learn and has been modifying the forms of teaching, which was once passive and based only on lectures, and nowadays, everyone tends to be active participants in and out of the classroom.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | Andrea Marcondes | 73 | view |
- Some people think that genetically modified (GM) crops are a positive development. Others, however, argue that they are potentially dangerous.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- In the past, university students had to go to lectures because this was the only way to teach large numbers of people. Thanks to technology, students no longer need to be taught this way.To what extent do you agree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Online
...eaching method with new resources. online practices have been part of young peopl...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...y listen to lectures. A good example is million of educational videos produced by indiv...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 454, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... out the importance of oral persuasion. so, online speeches as TED talks and so fo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, similarly, so, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57915057915 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98564715552 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640926640927 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.2590661991 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.5 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0859231499609 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0288368465997 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029560455287 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0508770138456 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118706240397 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.