Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional and religious festivals; during festival periods, people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Some people argue that the main reasons some traditional and religious festivals have been holding are forgotten in modern world and they are more likely to spend their time while enjoying. While I believe that these events play a role in culture, people do not exact information about history.
On the one hand, if you ask of every person who appear in these celebration, they know negligible data about of background. Children in school read a lot about religious and old function constantly that they remember some things about their lessons after grow up. In addition, broadcast (Television and Radio) are trying to spread critical historic events while grandparents tell the story of history to their children that means the reason of known festivals pass to next generation easily.
I believe that there are reasons for forgetting the mean of festivals. Firstly, because of the pressure of workload, people prefer to attend the program organized by fun activities because they have to plan to have a pastime. Secondly, it is clear that these events took place in the past some decades or even centuries and young people do not remember why they had happened, who were killed and why we have to respect them. A child would be confused with so many historic information and it is hard to memorize these things. Finally, some individuals do not understand why it is important to know the reasons of them in the past.
To conclusion, citizens take part in some festival without finding out the reason located behind it. I argue that in the world families are likely to enjoy the time instead of thinking of history lesson in the middle of celebration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | wardiati | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | toshaklg | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | rahulmudambi | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | Saeedeamani | 73 | view |
- Some people say that too much attention and too much many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion? 67
- as well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. to what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The use of mobile phone is an antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this celebration' or 'these celebrations'?
Suggestion: this celebration; these celebrations
...f you ask of every person who appear in these celebration, they know negligible data about of bac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[4]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much historic information', 'a good deal of historic information'.
Suggestion: much historic information; a good deal of historic information
...them. A child would be confused with so many historic information and it is hard to memorize these things...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91103202847 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56456007471 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576512455516 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8097056699 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166004093194 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584111187205 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372648738236 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986625401511 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488726226958 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.