why teenagers are unknown with the past culture?
what solutions there are for resolve it?
Fortunately or unfortunately, the modern young people unknown with the past generation. there are several reasons for occurring this event. In this essay I want to survey the reasons of this happening and give solutions for change it.
The first reason, and in my opinion the most important for it is development of technology, and advent of communicating gadget such as smart phone, tablet, etc. These instruments has made easy the young people access to information about other traditions from all around the world. When they familiar with other culture, there is likely that they enthusiasm gradually to that culture. Furthermore, the shortage of right informing through parents to children, also has influence in get distance them from original traditions.
Nonetheless, there are solutions for changing it. The first solution is government’s support for propagation culture and traditions related with that nation. For instance, it can explain the past positive traditions to new generation through social media, TV, magazine, and familiar them with the past cultures. Another solution, in my view is restrict of publishing culture of one nation in another country through the rules. In addition, the parents also, can explain to children about the their past traditions, and familiar them with the past culture.
By way of conclusion, however, the present of new technologies such as smart phone has made easy adolescent access to every information about other cultures that this happening perhaps lead to change traditions in new generation. Nevertheless, government notification through social media and TV likewise, familiar children through parent, also, can help to change this situation.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-24 | mohamadi654094 | 61 | view |
- do spend money for sports or cultural places is a positive development? 61
- The flowchart shows how concentrated apple juice is produced. 78
- alternative sources like wind are more positive than fossil fuels sich as oil and gasagree or disagree? 78
- The graph shows the percentage of overweight men and women in Australia between 1980 and 2010.
- Fossil fuels are the main source of energy for most countries However alternative sources of energy have been encouraged to be used by some countries To what extent is this a positive or negative development 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...eople unknown with the past generation. there are several reasons for occurring this ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... most important for it is development of technology, and advent of communicating ...
^^
Line 9, column 350, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'restricted'.
Suggestion: restricted
...ltures. Another solution, in my view is restrict of publishing culture of one nation in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 494, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...nts also, can explain to children about the their past traditions, and familiar them with...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, thus, for instance, in addition, such as, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6106870229 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95739220229 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545801526718 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6903747113 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216459423755 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858128220433 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739217533348 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133267871564 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105688151437 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.