Speaking topics in text
TPO 28 - Question 4
Speaking recording
Votes
This speaking topic by users
| Post dates | Users | rates | Contents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | Bobby1987 | 80.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2019-12-14 | Bobby1987 | 75.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2017-01-28 | paras001 | 80.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2019-12-11 | jeffhjz | 80.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2018-10-05 | mgrajapt | 90.00 | Check this speaking |
Speaking category
Speakings by user Seema Modak
:
- TPO 44 - Question 4Explain how the example in the lecture illustrates the concept of scope creep. 66
- TPO 35 Question 2 A university s academic reputation is the most important thing a student should consider in deciding which university to attend Use examples and details to support your opinion 47
- TPO17-Q4xplain the concept of rituatization using the example of dogs discussed by the professor. 66
- TPO44- 2 type instead of writeSome people believe that primary schools should no longer teach children how to write by hand, and instead should spend time teaching them how to type on a computer. Other people believe that it is still important for schools 83
- TPO44- 2 type instead of writeSome people believe that primary schools should no longer teach children how to write by hand, and instead should spend time teaching them how to type on a computer. Other people believe that it is still important for schools 66
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 657.0 592.248995984 111% => OK
No of words: 185.0 155.574297189 119% => OK
Chars per words: 3.55135135135 3.80514564318 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.525876923 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.84209364166 1.79077849142 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 93.7148594378 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578378378378 0.604071249207 96% => OK
Syllable count: 206.1 185.844578313 111% => OK
Avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.19417670683 92% => OK
Performance on coherence:
Topic speech coherence ratio: 0.0195018311686 0.0650381309087 30% => It may have issues on recording quality or the content is not so closely related to content.
Acoustic performance on paragraphs:
How many acoustic paragraphs: 1.0 4.35341365462 23% => Need more acoustic paragraphs.
Average paragraph length: 185.0 68.503853103 270% => The average paragraph length is high.
STD paragraph length: 0.0 21.3332995233 0% => OK
Average paragraph duration: 60.03 25.9943957902 231% => Need to control the rhythm of the speech
STD paragraph duration: 0.0 7.84667146824 0% => The duration of acoustic paragraphs keeps same.
Acoustic performance on sentences:
How many acoustic sentences: 53.0 42.0642570281 126% => OK
Average acoustic sentence length: 3.49056603774 4.02192344571 87% => OK
STD acoustic sentence length: 2.71002779008 3.1217529195 87% => OK
Average acoustic sentences duration: 1.12716981132 1.45093177766 78% => OK
STD acoustic sentences duration: 0.85284734496 0.99851816184 85% => OK
Acoustic performance on acoustic silence:(An acoustic silence means a little pause between two or more words)
How many acoustic silence: 52.0 39.0421686747 133% => It means the content is not pronounced smoothly or it is pronounced slowly. It is word by word.
Total acoustic silence duration: 4.39 7.12997991968 62% => OK
Average acoustic silence duration: 0.0844230769231 0.185688545393 45% => Maybe the speech rate is too fast.
STD acoustic silence duration: 0.0754834026978 0.155154303396 49% => OK
Acoustic performance on acoustic words:
Total word duration: 52.6 47.1480722892 112% => OK
Average word duration: 0.284324324324 0.305395592593 93% => OK
STD word duration: 0.141779054233 0.189427763521 75% => OK
Disfluencies: like hesitations, or 'ehn' or taking a long time to pronounce a word:
How many disfluencies: 8.0 7.94979919679 101% => OK
Total_disfluencies_duration: 5.64 6.2937751004 90% => OK
Total acoustic noise duration: 0.65 3.39508032129 19% => Good job. The lower, the better.
Acoustic rates:
Total speech duration: 60.03 59.7592369478 100% => OK
Compare to expected duration: 1.0005 0.995987282463 100% => OK
Rate of silence: 0.866233549892 0.656000678711 132% => Less acoustic silences wanted.
Rate of speech: 3.08179243711 2.60215298798 118% => OK
Rate of speech by unique words: 1.78244211228 1.56821927147 114% => OK
Rate of word duration by unique words: 2.03422053232 1.99336655568 102% => OK
Average articulation rates: 0.372904108108 0.317803793328 117% => OK
---------------------
It may have duplicated content. Need to use the words more efficiently.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by speech e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the speech e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas.