Do you agree or disagree with the statement: Internet is as important as other service such as building roads that government should make Internet access to all the citizens at no cost.
The internet is an irremovable part of modern people’s life, and the cost of internet access also a concerned topic of all citizens. However, not likely public roads, in my opinion, the government should not allow free access to the internet.
On the one hand, the charge of internet access is an important income of government. For most citizens, they would not spend a lot of money on the network, maybe just hundred dollars per year, but the sum of all the expenses from every citizen is huge revenue, which can help the government makes many different for their people. For instance, the government can use this revenue to invest some hospitals and medical institutes to preserve citizens’ health or to establish primary schools of left-behind children or poverty families’ children. The people in the country could achieve better public welfare, even if they are required to pay for their internet access costs.
On the other hand, not everyone wants to let internet access be free. Many parents and teachers disagree with the idea, because if the charge of internet access is canceled, their children or students will spend more time on the network yet study. There is no denying that compared with adults, many children do not do well in self-control. However, the most important job as a student is to study. If the Internet becomes free for everyone, the restrictions on children's access to it are further reduced. They will be able to play games and watch videos on the Internet with less stress than they used to be, because they don’t have to worry about the cost. More time on the internet means less time to study. None of the citizen wants to see this, considering the future of us.
All in all, the government should still let the citizens pay for their own bill of internet access in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-27 | Angelina2016 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people today are more likely to help others than young people were in the past. 90
- TPO44-W1 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and TV programs made in one s own country are more interesting than those made in other countries 90
- 6 integrated writing 3
- TPO32 Integrate writing 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ue, which can help the government makes many different for their people. For instance, the gov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, well, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 314.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85668789809 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59391336538 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544585987261 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2269211914 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324344762464 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11480983699 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611894839549 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22006399463 0.150856017488 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452083974816 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.