related well to people are more important than studying
In the last three decades, the ability to related well to people and its relation to success has been a common trend. Some people believe that working hard in schools and study academic subjects are the most crucial things to achieve success. However, others claim that relating well to people is more significant than studying to ensure success in a future job. From a personal perspective, the latter point of view carries more weight given that having functional social networks have a positive impact on people's experience and teamwork and communication skills.
The first and foremost point, provided that people have an active social circle, they could enhance their experience. A vivid example that could be given to shed light on that is the employees in the management department could promote their knowledge and amplify their understanding when they have extended relationships. To put it in other words, they could understand people's habits so that they could build up their business with confidence. Consequently, having many friends is integral to success.
Next, coupled with experience, teamwork is another noticeable benefit of relating well to people. If people are flexible and have many friends, they could boost their teamwork skills, which is essential to attain a good job. For instance, prestigious technological companies, such as Microsoft and Apple, put prerequisites for their applicants that they should have the ability to work on teams. Furthermore, the ability to relate well to people could increase companies' economic success. As a result, having expanded social networks is indispensable.
Ultimately, communication skill is another subtle point that should be born in mind. Although schools could teach their students many academic subjects, they could not educate them with various skills. As long as people have extended relationships, they could foster their social skills. For example, medical representatives who could relate well to people have proper communication skills, which could help them to achieve their target quickly; thus they could be promoted to managerial positions with high salaries. Therefore, functional relations with people have a considerable influence on people's career success.
Taking everything into consideration, without a doubt, related well to people is more important than studying hard in schools, not only because it could enhance people's skills, but also help them to get better jobs. It is suggested that schools educate their students about the importance of having extended relationships.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-28 | Christine hanna | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Christine hanna | 76 | view |
- Agree or disagree, people today spend time doing thing they like to do rather than doing things they should do? 78
- some people believe that schools with the same-age are better, while others think that schools with girls, and boys are more effective? which approach do you prefer? 80
- do u you agree or disagree, people should know about the news even it is unlikely that affect their daily life? 90
- tpo 33 60
- should universities increase their tuition fees or they should be limited? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2182.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53807106599 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84206847055 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515228426396 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9914278216 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.1 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30783757593 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11329270977 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133093462077 0.0737576698707 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22425547307 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154098274066 0.0645574589148 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.