Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.
Politicians are the peoples elected by an electorate in a representative assembly as a representative to present their needs and problems to the government. Politicians have a duty to understand the problems which are faced by an individual of a particular society or peoples or the populace and to make specific action to nullify it. Taking the common grounds to solve problems is taking a rudimentary approach to solve the problems and ignoring the elusive ones, can markedly hinder the development progress as ignoring elusive details can turn out to be fruitful in the sense.
Firstly, elusive ones are the area which are not given significant importance due to lack of resources or fear of failure but rather than ignoring one might take action to understand it as it might open new doors of success and can turn fruitful taking an example of Albert Einstein who has an ability to think out of the box, lead him to invent most of the things which was elusive to most of the contemporaries of that time. Similarly in the field of politics Mahatma Gandhi is considered as a father of Indian independence due to its elusive technique of attacking a government on the principle of nonviolence which extirpate the rudimentary notion of violence is important for winning any war.
Politicians are the peoples appointed by a crowd to take care of their needs and problems. But taking action is importantly concern with the individual elected as he/she has right to take action that can turn-out fruitful for people, for some instances taking common grounds are important as it gives a ready-made map of the implementation of policies, but the condition must be similar to other parts who have successfully implemented these policies and gain a fruitful result from it. Taking an example of road problems which are common to most of the other parts which can be taken for common as they help an elected person to take an action as quickly as possible as no time is to invest in making the implementation map.
Thirdly, policy making is an art which is considered by the most of the knowledgeable person before implementation without considering the contributing factors at the policy making becomes crucial roles therefore policy making are done by evaluating all the factors including the elusive ones, politicians must fully evaluate the pros and cons of specific policy and their consequences.
In conclusion, taking the elusive details are important for the development which can lead into innovative approaches to solve the problems, however, investing more time to problems in search of innovative ones can hinder the progress as well, hence one must thoroughly evaluate the needs and problems of the populace, and then considering the other contributing factors to take appropriate action.
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 33
- one should only consider the positive points and ignore the negative ones 50
- one should only consider the positive points and ignore the negative ones 50
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of thesocieties and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibilityof corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as m 33
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...ost of the contemporaries of that time. Similarly in the field of politics Mahatma Gandhi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...specific policy and their consequences. In conclusion, taking the elusive detail...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing factors to take appropriate action.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, similarly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2343.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 462.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07142857143 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95833209608 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437229437229 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 766.8 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 46.0 23.0359550562 200% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.761352891 60.3974514979 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 234.3 118.986275619 197% => OK
Words per sentence: 46.2 23.4991977007 197% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 5.21951772744 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108653073085 0.243740707755 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504619527517 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0250653872731 0.0758088955206 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0638718289543 0.150359130593 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314443278218 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.5 14.1392134831 180% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 16.33 48.8420337079 33% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.4 12.1743820225 184% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.4 11.2143820225 182% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.