Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.
Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
It has been a debatable issue whether laws enforced by higher authorities are able to solve modern society problem or not. I firmly believe that in 21st century laws are ineffective untill individuals have changed their mindset. First and foremost reason is that bureaucracy define the legal system on generic view; but, untill they not understand problem of every person then it is worthless. For example, government always urge to no use of plastic and in many nations top councile made a law as well. However, most people use it because of polythene is cheaper as compare to other material. Here, the government should represent the consequence of this malicious material towards the people and encourage them to curb the use of plastic. Hence, in modern world such laws are not able to solve complex issues as government employ on the government.
Furthermore, laws are developed for citizen of the country and it is benefited for them. but, effectiveness of the laws directly depends on the littercy level of masses. Country like India, where government enforces stringent legal system regarding traffic system. Owing to feel comfortable many citizens are not wear the helmet during driving. However, they know the consequence like they have to pay huge amount of fine. Apart from this, mostly individuals follow the laws because of fear of the fine and penalty. If they think about themselves and they consider the law positively then surely this legal system will give us the auspicious time.
Nevertheless, sometime laws are not produced a desirable result, at least it works in somewhat extent in different scenario. For example, in UAE some laws related to crime are very strict. Due to that people always think about it consequence when they miscreant the legal system. Today, in United Arab Emirates has a low crime rate as compare to other countries. Therefore, laws are essentially in any nations regardless of the mindset of individuals. Because of laws always help to regulate the country directly or indirectly.
In conclusion, I re-affirm that laws are not worthwhile untill people mindset are not changed; but it at least help to reduces the illicit activities in country. This controversial issues has many view points but I believe that people inner intention always plays the vital role in country and that silent intention sometimes hamper the change in nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | sapana | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | yswang | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | Susmita Dey | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Dhruv_gre | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | tulipkatie | 58 | view |
- Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the 50
- Some people say that E- books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree. 78
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them. 62
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue 89
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 565, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... use it because of polythene is cheaper as compare to other material. Here, the go...
^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...e country and it is benefited for them. but, effectiveness of the laws directly dep...
^^^
Line 13, column 120, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'reduce'.
Suggestion: reduce
...re not changed; but it at least help to reduces the illicit activities in country. This...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 189, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...s in country. This controversial issues has many view points but I believe that peo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, while, apart from, at least, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2010.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 391.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14066496164 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6881851574 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544757033248 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9660794863 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.3636363636 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7727272727 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199250389873 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577313120936 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311800532748 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1214500484 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338413409332 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.