Today it is a common practice for many business meetings and business training to take place online. Do the advantages of these new developments outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, it is not extraordinary to see employees of various enterprises meeting and taking part in training with the help of the internet. In my perspective, the companies are drawing more benefits such as convenience and cost-effectiveness than the drawback which is the absence of personalization in such meetings.
The considerable disadvantage of online business interaction is that they lack personalized attention and human touch. This is because employees and customers more often than not can view and discuss the agenda of the meeting or conduct training sessions on computer screens which only gets the job done and not engaging every mind and getting to know each other at a personal level due to which the bonhomie and friendliness among the employees are missing.
A good example of this would be that a town hall meeting setup over WebEx, an online meeting tool, fails to engage most of its audience due to its unidirectional interactive approach. Therefore, such apathetic meetings make their stakeholders detached and quite often isolated.
On the other hand, first of all, doing business digitally is extremely convenient for employees, customers, and vendors. This is due to the fact that they can meet anytime irrespective of where they are, with a single click of the button. As an example, all the stakeholders of Marks and Spencer which is a retail store chain are aligned at midnight and take business-critical decisions as to decide on what products will be kept in store for the next day. If they had not met online, their business would have lost thousands of dollars. Yet another significant advantage of teaching the employees online is that it reduces the overall cost of the training program drastically. Having trainers and trainees at a single platform sitting remotely can rule out the need for traveling from one place to another. It is needless to say how expensive it would be to arrange business travels of hundreds of its employees across the geographies. Hence, it is evident that online business meeting and training can prove to be convenient and can save a sizeable amount of money to corporations.
To recapitulate, while it could be a little engaging when meetings and learnings happen virtually, in my opinion, there are greater merits when it comes to convenience and saving a hefty sum for businesses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-03 | ashish kesar | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | ashish kesar | 67 | view |
- Today it is a common practice for many business meetings and business training to take place online. Do the advantages of these new developments outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Today it is a common practice for many business meetings and business training to take place online. Do the advantages of these new developments outweigh the disadvantages? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, while, as to, such as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.48453608247 267% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 4.92783505155 223% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 5.05154639175 376% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.03092783505 396% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 32.9175257732 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 26.3917525773 186% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.85567010309 182% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 937.175257732 212% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 386.0 206.0 187% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14248704663 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 3.78020617076 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02772609262 2.54303337028 119% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 127.690721649 170% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562176165803 0.622605031667 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 615.6 290.88556701 212% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.6656216128 44.8134815571 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.333333333 76.5299724578 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7333333333 16.8248392259 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 4.34317383033 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207021453477 0.216113520407 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694414081154 0.0766984524023 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390791362004 0.0603063233224 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915208464532 0.12726935374 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628764906111 0.0580467560999 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 8.37731958763 186% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 70.7449484536 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 7.45979381443 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 8.71597938144 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 41.2886597938 235% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 8.62886597938 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.