TPO 17
The lecture mainly contradicts the author's arguments stating that birds' population is due to a decrease as the results of human population-growth. The professor doesn't believe that the human population affects the birds' population, as sever compared to what the author assumes, and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First and foremost, the reading states that human expanse results in birds' settlement decrease. The professor, however, assesses this point by stating that not all birds' number is decreasing as the writer believes.
The professor provides many examples of birds whose numbers are actually increasing in cities: pigeons, hawks, etc; this plainly illustrates that the trend is not uniform, apparently. She concedes that some types of birds' habitat are in danger, but cities provide better and larger habitat for other types.
According to the article, wildlife and rural areas are destroyed because of agriculture usage. In contrast, the professor claims that fewer and fewer lands are used in the USA in recent years for agriculture usage. According to the professor, new crop production leads to less need for wildness destruction; therefore, the point claimed by the author is questionable.
Finally, the author wraps his argument positioning that pesticides, which are toxic, endanger birds' life cycles. The professor says that this claim is, also, problematic; considering, new pesticides contain less poison. While the reading asserts that poisoned water harm birds, the lecturer argues that new crops are pesticide-resident and do not harm birds at all.
To sum up, both the author and the professor hold conflicting ideas about the correlation between human being's and birds' populations. They have a hard time finding common ground about this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... human population-growth. The professor doesnt believe that the human population affec...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...e that the human population affects the birds population, as sever compared to what t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, apparently, but, finally, first, however, if, so, therefore, while, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49454545455 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84877006954 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2724205285 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.928571429 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306608577585 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10498784933 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517214051501 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148901101245 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414005243683 0.0443174109184 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.