Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Living in the age of technological breakthroughs, people have had different perspectives about which subject takes the leading position in the school's curriculum, science, and technology or history. While there are some valid arguments for the top role of history, I believe that the importance of these modern subjects would outweigh that of history.
There are several reasons why some people subscribe to the top position of history in training curriculum. Parents and people in the older generations would insist that lessons, which their children could be aware of how ancestors fought for the peaceful life in the present, would be a platform of raising a good individual. Stories from the past not only boost the gratitude and pride inside each person but also help the younger generation avoid failures and have a better step for future growth. For example, learning from the experiences of seniors, people could find solutions for some problems controlled in the past like pandemics and natural disasters.
Notwithstanding, I support the view that the priority should be given to subjects like Science and Technology. These subjects could bring the necessary skills for students surrounded by technology. For example, people, especially students, tend to spend most of their time using technological products such as social networks or games through their technological devices and forget other activities, which creates a harmful lifestyle. If schools teach those users how to manage their time to utilize technology more efficiently, they could avoid the following deleterious habit. Moreover, technological advances such as artificial intelligence, robots, and smart machines with their outstanding abilities have deprived some employees and created new jobs in technology manufacture. To adapt to this situation, students need a chance to encounter a training program focusing on science and technology since their school's days. Therefore, these students would be able to participate in groups working behind technology instead of being replaced.
In conclusion, while history plays an indispensable role in the educational program at schools, I claim that science and technology overwhelm the topmost position of history.
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.Wri 89
- The chart shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The plans show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words 78
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...bject takes the leading position in the schools curriculum, science, and technology or ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62241887906 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96994924167 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592920353982 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1488288204 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.142857143 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223113218866 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781694820442 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043374773432 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135042643669 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551717015386 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.