some people think that public health of a country can be improved if the government makes laws regarding nutritious food but other things that it is a matter of personal choice and personal responsibilities discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is believed that, a person with good health can become successful in comparison with that person who is not healthy. So, health always been debatable issue all over the decades. Some people have opinion that, by making rules and regulations on healthy food items, government can improve the level of health among the people, however others say that it is only depend on an individual's choice to be aware about his or her health conditions.
To begin with, due to globalisation and modernization there are a number of options available in the market to eat. Since people these days have a hectic lifestyle, they prefer to eat fast food than cooking food at home. This trend is increasing day by day. Thus, today, fitness and health rate is deteriorating gradually. To overcome this problem, government should make some effective rules. By doing that, probably government will be successful to keep up nutrients in the individuals' diet. Further, may be people will not suffer from the chronic diseases such as, obesity and the high blood pressure.
On the other hand, some people think that eating food is their own choice. According to them, imposing rules, is not a productive way to solve the problem of bad eating habits among people. This practice can make the people against the regime, as they suggest that they have several rights, which allows them to live independent life. Therefor, regulating food stuff is infringement in their life. Moreover, in this modern era everybody has knowledge about every kind of food, they know which food items have what effects on their health in the future.
In conclusion, people have opted modern world's eating habits, which become the reason of degradation of health. I think, government should make the rules for nutritious food by considering the choices of people.
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000. 56
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present 56
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead. 61
- Government should educate children about their health right from school by introducing subject like health . Do you agree with this ? 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of unemployed people aged between 15 and 24 in five European countries in 2005 compared with the overall percentage of unemployment in those countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main featu 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at person who is not healthy. So, health always been debatable issue all over the...
^^
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'been'.
Suggestion: been always
... person who is not healthy. So, health always been debatable issue all over the decades. S...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast food than cooking food at home. This trend is increasing day by day. Thus, to...
^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d is increasing day by day. Thus, today, fitness and health rate is deteriorating...
^^
Line 5, column 505, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rients in the individuals diet. Further, may be people will not suffer from the c...
^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther hand, some people think that eating food is their own choice. According to t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05280528053 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56719433847 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610561056106 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0491597197 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0588235294 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272589470709 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796234924446 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725230427625 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173981556695 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655673751008 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.