Scientists and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artists. To what extent do you agree.
It is considered that Scientists and experts of technology are given more importance and value when compared to Artists and musicians. In my opinion, I partly agree that scientists are respected and valued by society. However, I also believe that art is a very important part of our life and it is respected.
To begin with, Science is a field of study which helps society in different ways. It helps to improve the lives of people through various innovations and discoveries. Science has transformed the way humans live. Through branches like Physics and Chemistry, we can understand how the world operates. Hence, it is undeniable that science plays a crucial role and is very much valued. There is a huge demand for researchers and scientists in this rapidly changing world. However, this does not mean scientists should be treated superior to artists because Science does not play a major role in social matters. Arts have been the source of knowledge transferred from one generation to the other.
Art is a part of our culture and tradition. It has the power to unite people. It helps us to relax and socialize. Art helps us to understand the history and conditions of living in various periods of time. For example, great paintings from the period of Nizam rule in India help us to understand the various traditions followed in the 16th century. Also, arts flourished from the stone age and still continues to be an important and entertaining part of our lives. Artists work very hard to portray their feelings and they should be respected. They can also serve as motivation.
In conclusion, it is incontrovertible that science has a huge impact on society. But it is also necessary to understand that Art is also important in its own way.
- Scientists and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artists. To what extent do you agree. 61
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006 62
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 67
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 78
- The line graph shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, still, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89932885906 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80472079146 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546979865772 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3262403319 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.5238095238 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1904761905 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.089558748198 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.024902626303 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496372552547 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0592533983914 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623626662191 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.