Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to know what is happening around the world, even if it does not affect your personal lives.
Knowing about the world, as we all know, is one of the crucial factors which every country spend many times to evaluate it as a political assessment. Although it may seem exaggerated, at first sight, many people may find this contention sensible. In this regard, many people support this opinion that it is important to know about the world, even if it does not affect your personal life. I believe that having information about other countries is important both in political and social aspects. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason which makes me hold this belief is the political aspect. When people in a country be satisfied with their government, the possibility of the riot will decline and people will live in peace, and of course, peace all around the world is far better than evolution. Undoubtedly, un-calm relationships in the boundaries of a country likely to transform to the neighbor countries, unfortunately. Take ISS as an example; when it started in a distant country in the Middle East, there was no idea how much it could be transformed beyond the boundaries and destroy other countries.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is the social aspect. Although inbound situations of different countries may seem non-effective in other countries in a short time, unfavorable circumstances in a country or problematic relationships between countries can negatively indirectly affect the other nation. Without a doubt, people maybe indispensably have to endure circumstances that do not play any role in it. Take a general sample as an example, take into account a country which imports a necessary good from a country which is in an adverse situation. What would have happened if it had not allowed importing that specific good? The country should find another destination to buy that good, indeed. However, as long as they try to find another country, possibly the price of that specific good rises and people should bear the situation which has no specific role in it. Therefore, knowing about other countries positively useful.
To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we safely can conclude that knowing about nations have both political and social aspects considered by people.
- Three days at home with longer hours of work better than five days at work. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People care more about public recognition than money. Even if no more money is given, public recognition can still make people work harder. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One of the characteristics of successful leaders is a sense of responsibility for accepting their mistakes 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents should allow children to make mistakes and let them learn from their own mistakes 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 591, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...boundaries and destroy other countries. Another equally noteworthy reason to bea...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 950, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bout other countries positively useful. To summarize, contemplating all remarks,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, therefore, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1902173913 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89426540105 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548913043478 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6615290158 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72222222222 5.45110844103 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124978748223 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411938184569 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656963793582 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719059570938 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528691233565 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.