Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.
Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Today topic argue that the law and legal system cannot solve many matters of modern society. I partially agree with </span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">issues</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> are impossible to deal with </span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">legislation</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> matter, however, </span>in the portion of<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> my community </span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">has</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> the possible solution for it as well. The following essay will </span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">show</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> why such argument cannot be generalized that the problems of modern society could not resolved by laws and the legal system and advantages and </span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">disadvantages</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> on both side.
Admittedly, legal based solution might not </span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">give</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> the detailed settlement for prevalent problems</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> in </span>the whole<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> communities. According to the author, the relentless mind of general people are one reason of it. In addition, to deal with all the incidents of our society are </span>involvely<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> and </span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">perplexingly</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> convoluted so devising one exact solution probably not exists. For example, speaking of economical issue, if we pass a bill on regulation of </span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">an accident</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> to solve it, </span>the prediction of<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> it spread out and deteriorate another problems in diverse areas. Nonetheless, it is hard to admit </span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">all the</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> issue cannot be mended by the legal system according to the following reasons.
First, endless emissions of carbon </span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">dioxide</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> </span>are going to be<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> importantly argued to a problem of global warming and legal solution performed significant </span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">achievement</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> to relax the effects of carbon dioxide on </span>increment<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> of temperature in </span>the whole<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> earth by making a law related to regulation and </span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">restriction</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> of factories. In more details, the government </span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">impose</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> more burden taxes on the companies depending on the amount of producing </span>carbon<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> dioxide. After that, the companies </span>has been tried<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> to make a possible alternation of sources of engine instead of using carbon dioxide.
Second, interesting group will be the main issue discussing the possible agreement of different group. To take the problem and find common ground, united states adopted </span>the organization of<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> </span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">republican</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> and run the national assembly</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> to find the middle ground. even though the most people </span>have the different<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> minds and desires in society, we figured out the possible ways to maximize the total benefits of member in our society.
Secondly, starvation of poor people are main issue in modern society. To call to remembrance </span>the solution of<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> it, we have established the foundation for them at least to </span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">keep up</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> the </span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">least</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> quality of their life by the law. For example, the </span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">government</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> in some states managing the complimentary restaurant for homeless people and they also provide professional education programs to help the people who are seeking the jobs. by setting the minimal systems to support the second-class citizens, the social problems of increment of those people are not rapidly increasing </span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">today</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">, even though it decreases.
In conclusion, even though it seems enough to say the law and legislation system </span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">effects</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> nothing to solve many problems of modern society, we have already seen several examples which benefits to devised </span>a solution of<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> modern society. Therefore, it is hard to generalize which side on this issue are dominant and it would be better to consider all the sides.</span>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | sapana | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | yswang | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | Susmita Dey | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Dhruv_gre | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | tulipkatie | 58 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 50
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 75
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 83
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 66
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 873, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'resolve'
Suggestion: resolve
...he problems of modern society could not resolved by laws and the legal system and advant...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 462, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
...36px;'> to find the middle ground. even though the most people have the ...
^^^^
Line 17, column 779, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...lp the people who are seeking the jobs. by setting the minimal systems to support ...
^^
Line 19, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...px;'>, even though it decreases. In conclusion, even though it seems enou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, at least, for example, in addition, in conclusion, speaking of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 5244.0 2235.4752809 235% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 611.0 442.535393258 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 8.58265139116 5.05705443957 170% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97176167858 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 7.33802160003 2.79657885939 262% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 283.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46317512275 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1315.8 704.065955056 187% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.2 1.59117977528 138% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 162.501969219 60.3974514979 269% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 262.2 118.986275619 220% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 30.55 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0312405547741 0.243740707755 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356882154487 0.0831039109588 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398656760308 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0335793268499 0.150359130593 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254749025517 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 34.3 14.1392134831 243% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -9.73 48.8420337079 -20% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 7.92365168539 201% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.1 12.1743820225 182% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 33.08 12.1639044944 272% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 163.0 100.480337079 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 24.5 11.8971910112 206% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 25.0 11.7820224719 212% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.