TOP 47.
Pterosaurs reptile powered flight ability
The reading passage states that pterosaurs, a reptile with wings that used to live in ancient times, could not have the ability to fly and proposes some reasons. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points presented in the reading passage.
First, considering the reading passage Pterosaurus was a cold-blooded animal, since the other reptiles are now cold-blooded, and so it could not provide sufficient energy to fly. In contrast, the professor in the lecture contradicts the idea and further explains that recent discoveries show that the animal's body was filled with a hair-like cover such as fur, the feature exists among warm-blooded animals. Hence if they were warm-blooded they could obtain the energy to fly.
Second, the reading claims that these animals were too large to have the ability to fly since they could not flap their wings quick enough for this purpose. On the contrary, the professor in the lecture refutes the information in the reading and makes the point that pterosaurs had a special anatomic figure with hollow bones leading to a light weight. so they could have the ability to fly by flapping their wings despite their large figure.
Third, the author in the reading passage puts forward the idea that these animals could not take off because they did not have strong muscles in leg helping them to jump enough or run fast in order to launch a fly. On the other hand, the speaker in the lecture contradicts the idea and adds that comparing these animals to birds is a mistake. Ptosaurus had 4 legs despite birds having 2 limbs, and they could use all 4 limbs in order to run or jump. Therefore, actually they could launch a fly using their 4 limbs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-24 | shrjhn1234 | 3 | view |
| 2019-03-24 | fhk1368 | 70 | view |
- Chaco Canyon 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- Tpo41Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals. Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing 80
- TPO 55 Writing IntegratedBecause of climate change, more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry, unusable desert land. There are many proposals about how to stop this process, known as desertification. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 409, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ture exists among warm-blooded animals. Hence if they were warm-blooded they could ob...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 340, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
...c figure with hollow bones leading to a light weight. so they could have the ability to fly ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 354, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...hollow bones leading to a light weight. so they could have the ability to fly by f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8771331058 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44910927941 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508532423208 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0988678255 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.083333333 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0579929339284 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.023582301952 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313238955706 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0429936421689 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327363571996 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.