Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.
The author infers that each of individual in society has a responsible to obey just law and disobey and resist unjust laws. However, the author’s assertion show us only a one side to judge.
People should obey just laws because of their safeness. To illustrate, just law is based on people opinion and by the leaders of nation to help their nation from other harmfulness. For example, US have strict law to get a visa for other foreigners, this is because US government want to protect their US citizen from the terrorist and illegal immigrant. Nevertheless, people should fight for the unjust laws. For instance, oppressive colonial laws such as Imperial Japan which forces Korean people to use only Japanese had resulted in great resistance to unjust law. Similarly, Hong-Kong also fight against unreasonable law, which is extradition law, to become a democratic nation. As discussed above, history shows us how people fought for unjust law and the result was successful. Additionally, People should rely on the fair law to keep their safe from others.
However, there is no certain criteria of deciding which law is just or not. Every individual has all different perspective. For instance, same-sex marriage laws in US which allow full marriage rights for same-sex partners in one of the explainable example. Proponent of this law assert that the law is just and fair for the people right and freedom but others are worry about the potential risk to the social norms, parenting concern for adoption and religious view. Moreover, Hong-Kong’s protest against China also have two-side. People in China think that is reasonable law but willing democratic Hong Kong are not. Therefore, all of people have different sight of determine the law is just or not. It is difficult to make the law that every individuals are satisfying.
In sum, although some case seem to provide evidence supporting the given statement, we should keep in mind that against the unjust law is sometimes beneficial to all situations and also pursuit the just law is necessary but it is hard to determine which law is justice or not because of people have all different judgment. In conclusion, unjust law have to rectify by the government amendment process and people should protest against unjust law by not using the force and physical.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Nicole Metzner | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Abhipray Singh | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | ali.rs | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | ali.rs | 66 | view |
- In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh, most respondents said they preferred literary classics as reading material. However, a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type of boo 50
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information form the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed. 50
- The following appeared in a health magazine published in Corpora Medical experts say that only one quarter of Corpora s citizens meet the current standards for adequate physical fitness even though twenty years ago one half of all of Corpora s citizens me 53
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws. 50
- The department of agriculture in Batavia reports that the number of dairy farms throughout the country is now 25 percent greater than it was 10 years ago. During this same time period, however, the price of milk at the local Excello Food Market has increa 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 762, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... to make the law that every individuals are satisfying. In sum, although some case seem t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, similarly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 55.5748502994 85% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 2260.96107784 86% => OK
No of words: 385.0 441.139720559 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07012987013 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74774505443 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 204.123752495 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493506493506 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 705.55239521 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.1299267113 57.8364921388 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6 119.503703932 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 23.324526521 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15 5.70786347227 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346769592418 0.218282227539 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12985309689 0.0743258471296 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149056506334 0.0701772020484 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253044148569 0.128457276422 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11914622429 0.0628817314937 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.3799401198 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 98.500998004 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.