The bar chart shows the literacy rate (% of people who can read and write) byregion and
gender in 2011
The bar graph below provides information about male and female rate literacy in seven countries in 2011.
Overall, it can be seen that the rate literacy of male and female was always equal or slightly higher than rate of gender.
Looking at the first data set, on male rate literacy, in more detail, it is evident that the rate of male who literacy in the Central Asia was the highest, at 100% followed by Eastern Europe, East Asia and Caribbean is approximately equal at lower than 100% a little bit. The rate literacy of male in Arab states, South and West Asia, sub-Saharan Africa are more lower than 100% and all fell in the range.
Turning to the data set on female rate literacy, it can be seen that rate literacy of female in Central Asia was also highest at 100%. The rate of female who literacy in Eastern Europe, Pacific, Caribbean and Arab states all fell in the range from a little lower 100% to lower 80% respectively. Finally, female rate literacy in South and West Asia, sub-Saharan Africa were equal together at lower than 60%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-22 | sepehrk | 77 | view |
| 2021-11-24 | ashkan zaheri | 93 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 261, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...pproximately equal at lower than 100% a little bit. The rate literacy of male in Arab stat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 359, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'lower' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: lower
...h and West Asia, sub-Saharan Africa are more lower than 100% and all fell in the range. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er than 100% and all fell in the range. Turning to the data set on female rate l...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 32.9175257732 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 26.3917525773 114% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 937.175257732 93% => OK
No of words: 187.0 206.0 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67914438503 4.54256449028 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3031186001 2.54303337028 91% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 127.690721649 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.622605031667 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 290.88556701 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 16.3608247423 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.9844027878 44.8134815571 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 76.5299724578 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 16.8248392259 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 4.34317383033 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 7.41237113402 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186219857863 0.216113520407 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114482102171 0.0766984524023 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401231899984 0.0603063233224 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146064367494 0.12726935374 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309572926708 0.0580467560999 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 8.37731958763 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 70.7449484536 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 7.45979381443 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 8.71597938144 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 7.59969072165 103% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 41.2886597938 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 8.62886597938 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 8.54432989691 145% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.