The methodology of teaching is an important factor into how a student shapes into his future
The methodology of teaching is an important factor into how a student shapes into his future. A child can be considered as a mold of clay and teacher, a potter. The process by which the potter shapes his creation, that is; the amount of water content, the heat required for drying, etcetera determines how the final shape and structure of the pot he creates. The same goes with the teaching process for students. An experienced teacher uses techniques that are helpful to structure the future of the student.
A child is destined to commit both good actions and some very bad ones. Because at a young age he is not mature enough to understand the difference between good and bad. It is then, the responsibility of teachers and mentors to rectify the wrongdoings and praise for noble actions. The teacher can be faced with a dilemma, to scold and bash student for the wrongdoings or simply ignore and move on. I believe, it is not the best way of teaching to do the later, to support my case, I would mention some examples and conditions in which it might stand true while in some cases it would not.
As when a student commits a negative act, as mentioned above, he is not mature enough in the first place to understand that his actions are wrong. If the teacher ignores the act, he might never know if the action was wrong and should not be repeated again. This phenomenon can grow into something much bigger and dangerous while the first act would seem like an innocent decision. For example, if a student steals a pencil in class from another student and the action in not addressed properly, some years down the line the same student might grow into a small thief robbing a small shop or store. So simply ignoring is not the right teaching decision, on the other hand, instead of scolding the student, I believe, it is the responsibility of teacher to make him understand about his actions without intimidating him.
When a student commits a positive action, it is definitely the responsibility of mentor to praise and applaud for several reasons. Due to this action, the student will gain confidence, would motivate other to do the same and would spread a positive message in his peers. While, it should also be noted that, the message should be conveyed in such a way that the student does not gain overconfidence, and starts to bully over his peers. Hence a balance should be maintained in both the cases.
Hence I believe I have mentioned a few cases where this method would be advantageous and detrimental to support my stand on the issue.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-07 | petronerd54 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'teach' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
...eve, it is not the best way of teaching to do the later, to support my case, I would ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: REPEAT_AGAIN[1]
Message: Use simply 'repeated'.
Suggestion: repeated
... the action was wrong and should not be repeated again. This phenomenon can grow into somethin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 437, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ce, and starts to bully over his peers. Hence a balance should be maintained in both ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...uld be maintained in both the cases. Hence I believe I have mentioned a few cases ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, so, then, while, for example, in some cases, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66371681416 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60755313395 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486725663717 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3324183474 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289187573798 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914228928203 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184790014945 0.0758088955206 244% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152059101819 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.174866777221 0.0667264976115 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.