The graph below gives information about U..S government spending on research between 1980 and 2008.
The line graph represents the data about spending amounts on Five different types of research by the u.s authority from 1980 to 2008
Overall, it can be seen that, most significant source of research is health and higher amount of tallest had been contributed on health related to research by the u.s. government.In contrast other and general science had a comparatively amounts on research.
Firstly, from 1982 1984 amount on health research dropped slightly, then after it had experience at 23 billion dollar in 2004. Research on energy followed concave slope, Initially energy had second lowest amount in research among all other research and roughly at $5 billions dollars and it had remained 10 million dollar in 1996 then after it had decreased at same position just like as their beginning position(5%) in 2009.
Secondly, spending amount on others research had starting at near a tenth in 1980, then it slumped minimally to 25 billion dollar in 1968, but after this there was slight rose before dropping at 4 millions in 2008. Besides this, from 1982 to 1996 there was slow boost up in amount of General Science research followed by 3 million dollar decrease in 2008.
The US authority had spent less amount on space research, which was 6 million dollar in 1980 then after it followed stabilized try until 2008.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-13 | Shivam patel | 73 | view |
2019-12-13 | Shivam patel | 78 | view |
- The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include 84
- The process shows how carbon made in the environment 56
- The use mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking.Smoking is banned at certain places and so mobile phones should also be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart below show the proportion of the energy produced from different source in a country between 1985 and 2003 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unts on Five different types of research by the u.s authority from 1980 to 2008 ...
^^
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by the u.s authority from 1980 to 2008 Overall, it can be seen that, most signi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ated to research by the u.s. government.In contrast other and general science had ...
^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...d to research by the u.s. government.In contrast other and general science had a compara...
^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... among all other research and roughly at billions dollars and it had remained 10...
^^
Line 15, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at billions dollars and it had remained 10 million dollar in 1996 then after it ...
^^
Line 23, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...68, but after this there was slight rose before dropping at 4 millions in 2008. B...
^^
Line 23, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom 1982 to 1996 there was slow boost up in amount of General Science research fo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10859728507 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53837684665 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574660633484 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.3401843275 43.030603864 231% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 188.166666667 112.824112599 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.8333333333 22.9334400587 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1666666667 5.23603664747 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180450123973 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106120592149 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573636394586 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139720199651 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881608590541 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.1 13.2329268293 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.