Some people believe that companies should be allowed to collect data about customers freely, while others believe this practice should be restricted. Discuss both sides of this issue.
These days companies collect vast amounts of information about consumers, which has some favorable and unfavorable consequences. While allowing companies to collect customer data can help them create products that meet consumer demands, regulating this practice may be necessary because customer information is often stolen and/or used dishonestly.
Even the most successful companies rarely produce a great product on their first try. Instead, they submit their first attempts to rigorous testing so they can improve what they’ve created over time. Collecting data about current and potential customers is an essential component of this process. Companies need to learn as much as possible about what customers like and don’t like, where they live, how old they are, and what they do with their purchase. The internet makes assembling these data easy and efficient, and smart companies take advantage of it. Since this process often leads to useful and enjoyable innovations, it seems reasonable that companies should be allowed to collect the data they need to improve their products.
Unfortunately, customer data collection does not always lead to such positive outcomes. There are many examples in the news of financial institutions and large stores whose consumer data has been stolen and used for negative purposes. Companies that collect personal information and credit card numbers are particularly vulnerable to attack because this information can be used by criminals in a wide variety of ways. Furthermore, some companies sell their consumer data to third parties, such as insurance and medical providers, without disclosing this practice to consumers. Even if not technically illegal, this situation suggests that data collection should be restricted in some ways.
Until regulations are put in place, we should all assume that everything we do online is public information and that companies will use it to enhance their profits. Some of these uses will be for good, while others should be regulated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | Raji Hasan | 95 | view |
- Friendships can be very meaningful and special but also very complicated What are the qualities of a great friend What are some things that can weaken a close relationship over time 73
- It is wiser to use your money to gain meaningful experiences than to use it to acquire possessions.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people believe that companies should be allowed to collect data about customers freely while others believe this practice should be restricted Discuss both sides of this issue 95
- Some schools put the most advanced students in separate classes from their peers so they can study more challenging materials Do the advantages of this practice outweigh the disadvantages 79
- The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care system in an effort to deal with the health issues involved. Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons in th 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use ''.
These days companies collect vast amounts of information abo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 691, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion should be restricted in some ways. Until regulations are put in place, we s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, honestly, if, may, so, third, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55948553055 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80889102635 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594855305466 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4635582972 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.266666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343577478662 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128091477998 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944924117334 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223696682291 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414420433518 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.