The chart below show the proportion of the energy produced from different source in a country between 1985 and 2003
The pie chart compares the percentage of various six source, which contributed the energy to a nation in 1985 and 2003.
Overall, it can be seen that, in both year percentage of energy produced by oil dropped significantly in country over the period shown were as percentage of gas increased.
Firstly, the highest proportion of energy had been produced by oil, which was 52% in 1985, it then after slumped significantly to 39% in 2003, while percentage of gas had been rose 10% in 2003.
Secondly, in 1985 the percentage of energy producing went on 22%, although the equivalent figure in 2003 was 17%. The nuclear had same proportion of energy in both year at only 4%.
Thirdly, other and coal increased by 3% and 4% respectively in both the years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | Shivam patel | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Shivam patel | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Shivam patel | 56 | view |
- Some people think that children should get knowledge of every subject while others think that it is ok to study only specialised subject Do you think this both approach is advantageous for children Which is best method according to you from this two 89
- Men are placed in most high level jobs Some people say that the government should encourage a certain percentages of these jobs to be reserved for women To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology to homes in the UK 73
- The chart below show the proportion of the energy produced from different source in a country between 1985 and 2003 56
- More and more people want to buy famous brand of car cloths and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'source' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sources'.
Suggestion: sources
... compares the percentage of various six source, which contributed the energy to a nati...
^^^^^^
Line 17, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y in both year at only 4%. Thirdly, other and coal increased by 3% and 4% re...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 639.0 965.302439024 66% => OK
No of words: 131.0 196.424390244 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87786259542 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.38312328216 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74874886118 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610687022901 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 180.9 283.868780488 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.649936108 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 5.23603664747 236% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255152016931 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123956505543 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664183390973 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133179619916 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765303072876 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.