The chart below show the proportion of the energy produced from different source in a country between 1985 and 2003
The pie chart compares the percentage of various six source, which contributed the energy to a nation in 1985 and 2003.
Overall, it can be seen that, in both year percentage of energy produced by oil dropped significantly in country over the period shown were as percentage of gas increased.
Firstly, the highest proportion of energy had been produced by oil, which was 52% in 1985, it then after slumped significantly to 39% in 2003, while percentage of gas had been rose 10% in 2003.
Secondly, in 1985 the percentage of energy producing went on 22%, although the equivalent figure in 2003 was 17%. The hydrogen had same proportion of energy in both year at only 4%.
Thirdly, other had produced extremely lower amount of energy in 1985 followed by 3% rising in 2003. Besides this, in 1985 coal contributed 12% energy, though 10% higher energy had been produced by coal to nation in 2003.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | Shivam patel | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Shivam patel | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Shivam patel | 56 | view |
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drink cans 90
- Over population in urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that government and individual can tackle them 89
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drinks cans
- Many people believe that the lecture halls have been replaced by online learning To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart shows use of social media by men and women in Austrelia in 2007 and 2014. 22
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'source' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sources'.
Suggestion: sources
... compares the percentage of various six source, which contributed the energy to a nati...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent figure in 2003 was 17%. The hydrogen had same proportion of energy in both ye...
^^
Line 17, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y in both year at only 4%. Thirdly, other had produced extremely lower amoun...
^^
Line 17, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is, in 1985 coal contributed 12% energy, though 10% higher energy had been produc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 758.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89032258065 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63494486532 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561290322581 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2714259731 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.285714286 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8571428571 5.23603664747 226% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29603463759 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154879749316 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372100269745 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1755807721 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418853207689 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.