Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
The author implies the reason of which the scandals are necessary. Scandals not only attract the audience’s focus on the problems, but also influence the perspective of the public. It is undeniable that the scandals is the useful tool to make the public concentrated on the society topic, such as economic recession, policy or any other issues.
In a democratic nation, news media plays an important role in supervising the government. For example, residents do not know what the presidents did during the job; however, the media can reveals the scandals about corruption or any other illegal matters, which help the public to realize and protect their country. Albeit scandals are considered as a good measure to control government’s power, they are based on scanty truth sometimes.
There is no doubt that people loves news with attractive topic; namely, the scandals of celebrities arrested much more concentration of the public. Nevertheless, in order to augment revenue of the company, the staff of media pursue the scandals based on assumption rather than truth. The celebrities, as a result, loose their privacy under the supervision of the media; furthermore, some entertainers cannot tolerate the overwhelming criticism and suicide. The phenomenon was demonstrated by the increased rate of singers’ suicide in Korea.
With regard to the perspective, the scandals make an impact on the opinion of the public. People tend to form the incomplete picture of the society by virtue of scandals. For instance, there are more columns of scandals than that of universal news in order to increase the sales of newspapers. However, redundant scandals make people consider the society without satisfaction or even with more criticism. The researchers claim that the scandals are one of the reasons which contribute to dwindling satisfaction in modern society.
By the way of conclusion, not only can scandals supervise the government, they can also increase criticism and suicide. Scandals have the advantages and disadvantages. Most important of all, scandals should be controlled in a proper way to play their role, supervision.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 58
- Of the two leading real estate firms in our town — Adams Realty and Fitch Realty — Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...an truth. The celebrities, as a result, loose their privacy under the supervision of ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 222, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t of all, scandals should be controlled in a proper way to play their role, supervision.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, no doubt, such as, as a result, by the way, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 336.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40178571429 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07832921514 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6615433931 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.833333333 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149395100858 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485792153376 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335675586386 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898047202349 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378922911693 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.