Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: It's a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration.
When talking about the pros and cons of funding space travel or space exploration, different people hold different opinions based on their unique experience. Some people think that it is good to fund while others prefer to use the money on serious social problems like education or poverty. Consequently, there is no definite answer to this question. We can examine is case by case. As far as I am concerned, I do not agree that it is a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration.
To begin with, exploration of the universe can benefit our daily life. That is to say, in order to search space, scientists have to master the advanced technologies. Those technologies are not only helpful for space research but also helpful for human’s life. To instance, scientists utilize satellites to observe the universe. But we can make use of satellites to develop network. The current network is available via a newwork cable. If people move to a new house, they have to ask telecom service operator to lay competer or tellphone cables, which is seriously inconvenient. What’s more, the erection of network cables will be limited by location. But if we take advantage of satellites network, people will not suffer from complicated cables and remote region.
Furthermore, space exploration provides informations about potential treats from space. Namely, there are many meteoroids enter earth atmosghere everyday. Scientisicts have to determine whether the comets or asteroids could make impact events. Through the research of universe, scientists can realize how asteroids move and how form, using the data to predict the path of asteroids and the speed of asteroids. So people can prepare for the coming treat. It is really important for the government to sponser space activities, benificail to Earth safety.
To sum up, given all the points and examples provided above, I strongly believe that it is essantial for the government to fund space travel or space exploraton. Because space technologies can promote our life more convenient and also protect Earth from outer treats.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: It's a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration. 70
- People will spend less time on cooking food in twenty years. 70
- In order to attract more tourists government should improve the safety by hiring more police or improve the appearance by improving the old buildings and streets 78
- Imagine that your city government has given permission for a major company to build a large factory near your neighborhood Do you think this is a good idea Why or why not Explain your position using specific reasons and examples 70
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home Which do you prefer 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... many meteoroids enter earth atmosghere everyday. Scientisicts have to determine whether...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, really, so, while, talking about, to begin with, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18367346939 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85040557476 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588921282799 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5280031249 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8181818182 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5909090909 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340221663092 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861390206871 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136189168598 0.0737576698707 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209653003968 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107495435495 0.0645574589148 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.