The graph below shows the number of male and female students studying IT at university from 1985-2015.
The graph below shows the number of male and female students studying at university from 1985-2015.
The graph shows information about IT at university in 1985 female students studying very less than man students. woman pupils were only around 1000 and male students were more than female pupils.they were around 5000. After that in 1990 they both only increased. In 1997 year they equaled. Then female pupils grew than man students. In 2006 they both were around 27000.
so in 2010 woman students was increased and they were 33000. but man pupils was around 34000. Sure male students were so much more than woman pupils. In 2015 man pupils were around 40000 and female students were 27000. The graph shows in 2015 female didn't grow.
In conclusion female pupils didn't grow and from 1985 to 2010 male and woman students grew. but the graph shows that from 2010 female students decreased. We don't have information in 2019. I think the number of woman learners will rise too
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-18 | Nozima Rakhimova | 56 | view |
2019-12-18 | Feruzabonu | 61 | view |
2019-12-18 | Feruzabonu | 61 | view |
2019-12-18 | Feruzabonu | 61 | view |
2019-12-18 | Feruzabonu | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of male and female students studying IT at university from 1985-2015. 56
- The graph below shows the number of male and female students studying IT at university from 1985-2015.Summarise that the 78
- The graph below shows the number of male and female students studying IT at university 1985-2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the number of male and female students studying IT at university from 1985-2015. 56
- The graph below shows the number of male and female students studying IT at university from 1985-2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Woman
...s studying very less than man students. woman pupils were only around 1000 and male s...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...an female pupils.they were around 5000. After that in 1990 they both only increased. ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... 2006 they both were around 27000. so in 2010 woman students was increased an...
^^
Line 9, column 62, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ents was increased and they were 33000. but man pupils was around 34000. Sure male ...
^^^
Line 9, column 251, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e 27000. The graph shows in 2015 female didnt grow. In conclusion female pupil...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... graph shows in 2015 female didnt grow. In conclusion female pupils didnt grow a...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 29, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...row. In conclusion female pupils didnt grow and from 1985 to 2010 male and wom...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 92, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...5 to 2010 male and woman students grew. but the graph shows that from 2010 female s...
^^^
Line 13, column 157, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...from 2010 female students decreased. We dont have information in 2019. I think the n...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, then, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95209580838 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.12184004357 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455089820359 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 22.4926829268 44% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6900613525 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 51.6875 112.824112599 46% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.4375 22.9334400587 46% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.3125 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457100955722 0.215688989381 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176057974621 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.25053781903 0.0843802449381 297% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.433078722213 0.15604864568 278% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.330979918269 0.0819641961636 404% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.1 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.71 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 3.7 10.3012195122 36% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.95 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 5.65 8.06136585366 70% => OK
difficult_words: 16.0 40.7170731707 39% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 11.4329268293 35% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.9970731707 55% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.