Some people believe that the government should take care of old people and provide financial support after they retire. Others say individuals should save during their working years to fund their own retirement. What is your opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience.
A handful of people think that it is the government's responsibility to look after senior-citizens intellectually and financially post their retirement, while others hold an opinion that money should be stocked during their productive days in order to lead an independent old age life. While i agree that the administration must subsidize the basic services for retired people, relying on government for everything can not be considered as a viable option.
Undoubtedly, in modern days, people work hard to have a satisfactory life-style and meet ongoing demands. In spite of this, they are paying a reasonable amount of tax every year out of their income. In return, if the government would render their basic needs such as medical & healthcare services when a person is old and no more productive it should not be a matter of concern. For instance, Financing free health check-ups and emergency medical services for senior citizens regularly should be high on the agenda for an administration. Moreover, a person contributes to a country's economic growth for their entire life. Thus, fulfilling basic wants should have a place in lawmaker's liabilities.
On the flip-side, the government has numerous responsibilities towards the nation and every person, be it young or old. Therefore, rather than depending on policymakers entirely, people should accumulate a certain amount of money for their old days. This way, they can enjoy their retirement days autonomously and accomplishing their long-pending holidays' dreams, such as spending quality time at exotic places without any financial concerns. Although, they would have basic support from the nation's government, living carefree and peaceful life can be achieved by having plenty of stocked money handy.
In conclusion, unequivocally, saving money from a young age is vital for every person in order to live a harmonious life after retirement, as the government should not be considered as an entity who takes care of everything post-retirement, but the basic ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | nainsi1991@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | deeksha kapil | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | deeksha kapil | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-24 | tina ahoura | 73 | view |
- Today more and more people choose to live by themselves What are the causes of this Is this a positive or negative development 56
- Today people can work and live anywhere they want because of the improvement of communication technology and transport Do advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 67
- You are not satisfied with the changing rooms in a sports centre that you visit Write a letter to the manager What the problem is How you feel about the problem What steps you want the manager to take 89
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding changes Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Nowadays, people are spending increasingly large amounts of money on their marriage parties. Many people feel large and expensive weddings cause problems for the bride and groom. Do you agree? Use personal examples in your response. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... handful of people think that it is the governments responsibility to look after senior-cit...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...lead an independent old age life. While i agree that the administration must subs...
^
Line 9, column 494, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... they would have basic support from the nations government, living carefree and peacefu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42586750789 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17202709069 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589905362776 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0407386677 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.307692308 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296158692255 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103912825117 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602697895576 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190356897962 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279376908489 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.