The graph below shows the number of male and female students studying IT at university from 1985-2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of male and female students studying IT at university from 1985-2015.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph illustrates the number of male and female students studying it at university. The date range demonstrates on the bar chart varies from 1985 to 2015.

Overall, it can be seen that there was increase of amount of boys from 1985 untill 2015. girls go up sharply from 1990 to 2010, then decreased.

The enrollment of 500 male scholar climbed steadily in 1995 where female students rose rapidly in the year 2000. In camparison by 2010, male and female students became more likely to learn. boys pupils picked up more than girls pupils in 2010. Feminine scholars declined dramatically this was about 29000 pupils in comparison boys pupils in 2015. then boys pupils reached a peak with 40000 students.

Generally, the graph shows that the number of two genders attained had a greater impact on people's education to computer programming in the past than more recently.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-18 Nozima Rakhimova 56 view
2019-12-18 Feruzabonu 61 view
2019-12-18 Feruzabonu 61 view
2019-12-18 Feruzabonu 61 view
2019-12-18 Feruzabonu 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... bar chart varies from 1985 to 2015. Overall, it can be seen that there was i...
^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Girls
...f amount of boys from 1985 untill 2015. girls go up sharply from 1990 to 2010, then d...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y from 1990 to 2010, then decreased. The enrollment of 500 male scholar climb...
^^^
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'scholar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'scholars'.
Suggestion: scholars
...eased. The enrollment of 500 male scholar climbed steadily in 1995 where female s...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arison by 2010, male and female students became more likely to learn. boys pupils...
^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Boys
... students became more likely to learn. boys pupils picked up more than girls pupils...
^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...clined dramatically this was about 29000 pupils in comparison boys pupils in 201...
^^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s about 29000 pupils in comparison boys pupils in 2015. then boys pupils reac...
^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Then
...ls in comparison boys pupils in 2015. then boys pupils reached a peak with 40000...
^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n comparison boys pupils in 2015. then boys pupils reached a peak with 40000 s...
^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...boys pupils in 2015. then boys pupils reached a peak with 40000 students. ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reached a peak with 40000 students. Generally, the graph shows that the numb...
^^^
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally, the graph shows that the number of two genders attained had a greater impa...
^^
Line 7, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ph shows that the number of two genders attained had a greater impact on peoples...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 730.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96598639456 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48076500526 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9795391114 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.0 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 5.23603664747 15% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 1.69756097561 825% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246908764296 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982339651825 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924553267791 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154744276027 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101527523286 0.0819641961636 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.95 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.