The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in canada in 2005 and 2010.
The circular charts compare the variations in the online sales for retail sectors in Canada within five years (from 2005 to 2010). Unit measurement was in percentage.
A quick look at both the pie charts is quite enough to make it clear that the consumption of electronics and appliance was maximum in 2005. However, food and beverage attained top place in 2010.
In the analisation of Canadian online sales for retail sectors, in 2005, electronics and appliance had become market leader with more than one third. Home furnishings were stood at second rank through the contribution of one quarter of the entire sales. Last two positions were taken by food and berverage (22%) and video games (18%).
In comparison, with 2005 sales examination in Canada, after five years, in 2010, there was 5 and 10 per cent slip back in the participation of electronics and appliance and home furnishings consecutively. In contrary, video games and food and beverage had touch roughly one third and a quarter of whole online sales.
- The diagram shows the process of the water treatment 93
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers. 73
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992. 78
- The diagram shows the process of the water treatment 78
- In many countries people tend to move overseas or move to a different part of their country after their retirement Discuss why they do so and what the outcome of this sitation is 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'touched'.
Suggestion: touched
..., video games and food and beverage had touch roughly one third and a quarter of whol...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98235294118 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73662839057 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605882352941 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.8535225615 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1111111111 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304841622048 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110447337051 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128082847423 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191885036295 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105039808388 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.