TPO 10
The reading and the lecture are both about the reasons which caused the sea otters population to decrease. The author of the reading feels that the surrounding contaminations affected their lives and gave three possible reasons for his claim. The professor disagrees with the reasons made by the author. She is of the opinion that these explanations are faulty.
To begin with, the author argues that there are several observations of pollutants like oil rigs and industrial chemical pollution which increase in the water and endangered the lives of sea mammals. The lecturer, on the contrary, says that there is no evidence of pollutions in the water.
Secondly, the writer suggests that the population of other sea creatures such as seals and sea lions is diminishing. In the article it is said that this situation only occurs when broadly hunting animals like orcas attack to their baits, but, orcas preferred larger animals like whales. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that when the whales hunted by human, consequently, orcas compel to change their diet and started to hunt smaller mammals. Therefore, the density of smaller sea mammals decreased in order to hunting by orcas.
Finally, the author points out the pollution affected the unequal pattern of otter reduction. Moreover, in the article, it is stated that ocean streams or other environmental elements may have resulted in this condition. In contrast, the lecturer’s position is that the orcas forced to find alternatives for food supplies. As a result, they started to hunt sea mammals. But, sea mammals are small creatures that could swim to shallow and rocky locations which orcas could not reach there. So, the population of the sea otter in these locations remained constant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-24 | sonyeoso | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-29 | Sumilak | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-02 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-12 | shayanhgh | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | alimohaddesi | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'otters'' or 'otter's'?
Suggestion: otters'; otter's
... about the reasons which caused the sea otters population to decrease. The author of t...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e three possible reasons for his claim. The professor disagrees with the reasons ma...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, as for, in contrast, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2027972028 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7075424921 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548951048951 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0248717279 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34220487223 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102252855196 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643896816552 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189171596727 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585353192862 0.0443174109184 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.