at universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.
Although many people believes that science discoveries are more vital than sports, I completely concede the concept of having equal opportunities and supports for both scientific classes and laboratories as well as sports' infrastructures in knowledge-based institutes like universities. For this opinion, I have three main reasons. The following presents these major reasons.
First, since the general health of humans' bodies is as important as their minds, there must be an acceptable rate of balancement between these two main aspects of mankind. Having a healthy body will definitely help an individual to work in his/ her profession better and more efficiently. For example, most of the doctors who have to stay on their feet for long hours in order to finish their sergeories, exercise at least 20 minutes per day. This helps them not losing their focus on their demanding and challenging tasks.
Second, each society obviously have diverse aspects; sports competitions is considered as one of them. If nations and countries want to have an appropriate and acceptable level of international figure, they must not abuse equality among their people. China and USA, for instance, always have the highest rates of The Olympics medals inasmuch as they not only concentrate on their technological developments but also supports their athletes. Therefore, this culture must be adapted in universities in the first place in order to develop skilled and seasoned experts in both scientific professions and sports.
Third, as income is on of the principal issues for all universities, offering diverse majors can be beneficial for them insomuch as they can accept more students from all over the world, which can persuade the governments to have an increase in universities' financing. Comparing European universities with USA's, for example, proves this argument. Most of the universities in The United States have majors in sports which always helps them to attract more money from both students and the government. European universities, on the other hand, mostly offer scientific majors. For this reason, most of these institues suffer from lack of budget for their laboratories and researchers.
In conclusion, focusing on scientific classes and libraries must not overweight sports and social activities since these two main majors are important and benefical for both individuals and universities. Moreover, governments and societies also benefit from this decision by having healthier citizens.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-26 | AliOmar | 76 | view |
2020-01-23 | King harald | 80 | view |
2020-01-20 | Barana | 76 | view |
2020-01-09 | Lutfor Rahman Rony | 73 | view |
2020-01-07 | FarhadEbrahimi | 60 | view |
- TPO 23 independent Agree or disagree in today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct 90
- there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to him were actually painted by him.first there is something inconsistent about the way the woman in the portrait is dressed.second, this in this painting the elements of light and shadow do not fit toget 66
- history courses should be required in universities or not 73
- young people more independent today or in the past 78
- TPO 21 integrated genetically modified trees are good because they are designed to be harder than natural trees they have many economically benefits their utilization can prevent over exploitation of wild trees 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 464, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[10]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to lose'.
Suggestion: to lose
...20 minutes per day. This helps them not losing their focus on their demanding and chal...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, well, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2131.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53506493506 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0004171296 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566233766234 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3269157191 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.388888889 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3888888889 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38888888889 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111509069889 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348788035727 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496215075162 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757235760088 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470654590621 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.