As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the user should cover the costs. Discuss both these views and give your opinion?
Due to the increased amount of traffic on the road, more money is required for transport infrastructure. While it can be beneficial if the government bear this financial burden, I think it is more sensible for road-users to cover the expenses.
On the one hand, there are good reasons why the government should responsible for spending on road improvements. Transport infrastructure is a vital public service, along with education and healthcare system. It is key to boosting the country’s economy because it improves the movements of goods and people. For example, the dominant economic status of China is partly due to the strong railway networks that link every part of the country together. Moreover, only the government can manage such a crucial sector because it has the authority to fundraise through the tax system and is in the position to ensure the interest for all.
On the other hand, it is more sensible to make road-users to pay for the transport systems. Firstly, road-users are those who directly benefit from the improvement of roads. They enjoy a better quality of life since their daily commute is less stressful and time-consuming because of eased traffic congestion. Another reason would be that by imposing taxes on road users, such as green tax, as in England, congestion tax or through toll system, people are discouraged from driving, which leads to the reduction of exhaust fumes and green-house gas emissions. For example, by making fuel-driven the subject to the green tax, the authority is encouraging a switch to hybrid or electric cars, which are more sustainable and environmentally-friendly forms of transportation.
In conclusion, I believe that road users should cover the costs related to road improvements.
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- What are the tasks of universities to offer student knowledge and skills essential for their future career or to provide students with access to knowledge itself What do you think university education should contain 33
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sport to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The diagram shows how hydro-electric power is generated. 61
- Some people hold that we should spend amount of time and money on the protection of wild animals. Some people argue that they should be spent on human populations. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or road-users to cover the expenses. On the one hand, there are good reasons ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'boost'?
Suggestion: boost
...ion and healthcare system. It is key to boosting the country's economy because it i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 965.302439024 153% => OK
No of words: 282.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23758865248 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18366456057 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 106.607317073 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58865248227 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 283.868780488 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2209124748 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.615384615 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230377864223 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846502170519 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831878437961 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161337224173 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717426600569 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 40.7170731707 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.