Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes it is better to be
dishonest. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
It is all obvious that honesty is the fundamental structure of any relation and it is extremely significant that both side of a relation must be honest and sincere to each other, but sometimes in special circumstances it is vital to be dishonest. I personally believe that honesty will harm us in very rare manners. Following paragraphs fully demonstrate why I think this way.
First of all, being honest with a friend who uninterruptedly tries to cheat us and exploits us is a clear insanity. There are many individuals sometimes want to abuse us and just think of their own benefits. Moreover, some people try to make us dishonorable and decrease our dignity in the society, so apparently if we be honest with such guys it will be catastrophic to us. My own experience clearly indicates this. Last semester a new student participated our biology class. As I had the first grade in the class, soon he got accustomed to me and became one of my closest friends. I faithfully helped him in his lessons, but after sometimes I considered that he is cheating and his aim is abusing me to get the highest degree in the class. Because I assisted him a lot he so got the first grade.
Secondly, when we participate in a match or competition, it is extremely important to cheat our opponent in order to gain the championship. Both side of the race want to defeat each other in any match, and use different strategies to cheat the antagonist and gain the triumph. For instance, last week I attended a mathematics competition. At first my competitor came and asked about my math knowledge and wanted to analyze my degree, so in this case if I had told him the truth that I have such kinds of abilities in mathematics, he would have certainly defeated me. I gave him the wrong information, as a result I could defeat him and gain the prosperity.
In the conclusion, I strongly believe that being honest in very specific states will cause us to suffer and we will be disappointed that why we were honest. I think this way because sometimes some people want to exploit us, and because being honest to competitor in a match will cause us to fail.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-28 | Bashir Ahmad Faizi | 3 | view |
- Reading states that invasion of zebra mussels is not stoppable but on the other hand the professor argues that this invasion can be stopped 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People communicate witheach other less than in the past because of the popularity of television. Use specific reasonsand examples to support your opinion. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes it is better to bedishonest. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...titor in a match will cause us to fail.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, i think, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61942257218 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88188498295 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517060367454 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2759456545 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7777777778 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0461192134558 0.236089414692 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0151352346788 0.076458572812 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0159259191783 0.0737576698707 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0294671939288 0.150856017488 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0106305557019 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.