Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They believe it has many health-promoting nutrients, such as cartilage, which can heal our joints, and chondroitin, which promotes nerve regeneration. Skeptics point out that ingested cartilage can’t replenish cartilage in your knees or elbows and ingested chondroitin doesn’t make our brains any healthier. Yet, there is strong anecdotal evidence that people who consume bone broth have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases than those who don’t. Therefore, ancient humans knew something about our physiology that we don’t, and that by emulating the way they ate, we can cure many chronic illnesses.
The argument is based on assumptions that we are exactly similar to our ancestors and there is no further development or mutation occured in all those years, so what was fit for our ancestors is still fit for us. There are many evolvement of human morphology in all these years, which resulted in changing food habits and digestion process so it is not valid to compare 20th century of humans which their ancestors food habbits and metabolism.
Nowadays with techical advancement people are less involved in physical activities as machines are there to do so, which ultimately results in bad metabolism. Assumptions would be only valid when the whole environment of our ancestors and present scenario is similar. The argument also fails when it is assumed that only bone broth soup is responsible for their good health.there could be other reasons which could lead to better metabolic and inflammatory diseases.
Apart form bone broth soup what else the used to take in their diet hold equal importance while deciding its advantages and what are their daily activities which affects metabolism should be stated. skeptics point is also based on some assumption that ingested cartilage directly affects knees or elbows without taking in account all the effect of eating bone broth soup, directly comming on effects on brain health is unfair because without a good healthy body one can't improve healthy brain. the Argument is based on assumptions which need to be elaborated by providing more detail information circumscribed reasons for this observation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jason123 | 69 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Chayank_11 | 57 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | hyunjulia99 | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | neha1980 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | noitsimani | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he argument is based on assumptions that w...
^^
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun evolvement seems to be countable; consider using: 'many evolvements'.
Suggestion: many evolvements
...ncestors is still fit for us. There are many evolvement of human morphology in all these years,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'evolvements'?
Suggestion: evolvements
...ors is still fit for us. There are many evolvement of human morphology in all these years,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 911, Rule ID: APART_FORM[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'apart from'?
Suggestion: Apart from
...er metabolic and inflammatory diseases. Apart form bone broth soup what else the used to t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Skeptics
...h affects metabolism should be stated. skeptics point is also based on some assumption ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1378, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...because without a good healthy body one cant improve healthy brain. the Argument is...
^^^^
Line 1, column 1407, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...y body one cant improve healthy brain. the Argument is based on assumptions which ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 28.8173652695 66% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 55.5748502994 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 2260.96107784 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 252.0 441.139720559 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15079365079 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.56307096286 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71844802922 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 204.123752495 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615079365079 0.468620217663 131% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 705.55239521 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 19.7664670659 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.8473053892 136% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.2652560305 57.8364921388 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.25 119.503703932 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5 23.324526521 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.70786347227 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 5.15768463074 19% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202860148638 0.218282227539 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798066217816 0.0743258471296 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039789070129 0.0701772020484 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202860148638 0.128457276422 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0628817314937 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 14.3799401198 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.3550499002 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.197005988 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.5979740519 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.32208582834 112% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 98.500998004 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 12.3882235529 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.1389221557 129% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.9071856287 168% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.