In some parts of the world, it is becoming popular to research the history of one's own family. Why might people want to do this? Is it a positive or negative development?
In several countries, people are becoming increasingly keen to learn about the history of their family. While this trend can be negative to some extent, I would argue that it is a positive trend.
To begin with, there are some reasons why people consider this trend as a negative trend. Firstly, since it takes a lot of time and money to research family history, people have less time for other important areas. For example, instead of research family history, they can spend more time to learn other foreign languages which leads to easier job opportunities. Secondly, the information on the history of a family may have adverse effects on their attitude in life. For instance, a person with a noble may become arrogant, while someone who is a descendant of a criminal might be ashamed and lose his confidence.
However, I would argue that this trend is positive because of some reasons. Firstly, since spending time researching their family, people might have knowledge about genetically inheritable medical conditions such as asthma, obesity, and diabetes. As a result, they can have a better treatment direction. Secondly, because, since individuals learn about their history, they might expand their knowledge about their family traditions. Therefore, cohesion among the members is enhanced.
In conclusion, researching family history is more common in society, and I believe this is a positive development.
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 56
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 61
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 61
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 61
- The charts below show what UK graduate and post graduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 226.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3185840708 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7644210336 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548672566372 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3569842516 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4615384615 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3846153846 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6153846154 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218496740674 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827930452479 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063583814969 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15693735769 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403960004188 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.