The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Submitted by Kien Vu on Thu, 01/09/2020 - 11:23

<p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0px; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 15px; white-space: normal;">The bar chart illustrates the percentage of people who hold a science qualification in Singapore and Malaysia. A prominent feature is that a significantly low percentage of people hold science qualifications, that is Master’s and Bachelor’s degrees in science from university level studies in both countries. Less than 5% of people hold a qualification in science at Master’s degree level in both Singapore and Malaysia.</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0px; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 15px; white-space: normal;">There is a significant difference in the percentage of people holding science qualifications at Bachelor level between the two countries; while this number is 20% in Singapore, in Malaysia it is a mere 10%. The percentage of people with school leaving exams in science is slightly higher in Malaysia than in Singapore. 35% of people in Malaysia have a science qualification at this level, whereas the number in Singapore is 5% lower. Finally, more than half the people in both countries hold no science qualification at all.</p>

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-09 Kien Vu 56 view
2020-01-09 Kien Vu 56 view
2020-01-09 Kien Vu 56 view
2019-10-10 Garrett 56 view
2019-08-06 raminghorbanii 67 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user Kien Vu :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.20111731844 4.92477711251 126% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.28516748114 2.65546596893 161% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491620111732 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 136.333740831 43.030603864 317% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 185.0 112.824112599 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130604627233 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086127556288 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0144987741326 0.0843802449381 17% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130604627233 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.7 13.2329268293 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 61.2550243902 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.3012195122 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.27 11.4140731707 169% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 23.0 11.4329268293 201% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 23.0 11.0658536585 208% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.