Due to the increasing density of living areas in a city, most residents are suffering from physical and social dangers. Consequently, they are against living in the city.
With the development of socio-economic development, urban areas have become much more overpopulated and this leads to some social as well as health problems for those who are living in the cities. There are those who argue that people would not like to live in the city because of these negative issues. To my mind, it is unacceptable to agree with this viewpoint for concrete reasons.
First of all, the life of city has been considered as the best place to make money even though persons deal with some problems. It is clear that while manual workers and skilled employees have a great deal of opportunities to have a good job with high salary because there are varieties of industrial zones to attract numbers of labourers. Meanwhile, in the countryside, it is impossible for labourers to apply a good job to earn money. Therefore, living in city is still an ideal place to have stable income although people cope with crimes or contaminated environment.
Another important thing is that persons who live in cities, they have better health service and better standard of living. It may be true that most hospitals with advanced technologies are located in big cities. Therefore, if people are suffered from serious diseases such as diabetes, stroke and cancer, they have better opportunity to be cured and looked after by competent doctors and nurses. According to this, people live in cities with a large amount of money; they also enjoy both material and cultural life thanks to theatres, cinemas and supermarkets. Therefore, most people still would like to live in city.
It seems to me that although persons surely deal with social and physical issues, they may have a strong determination to live in city. These reasons can be indicated such as high income and available services to meet demands of improving standard of living
- The bar chart gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001 and the pie chart gives information about the library's membership in 2010 78
- The bar chart gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001 and the pie chart gives information about the library's membership in 2010 73
- The bar chart gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001 and the pie chart gives information about the library's membership in 2010 100
- The bar chart gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001 and the pie chart gives information about the library's membership in 2010 73
- The bar chart gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001 and the pie chart gives information about the library's membership in 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96116504854 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68495316776 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553398058252 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4601036842 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193839219244 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727750492187 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732513415275 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128123926006 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737607160248 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.