Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">It is argued that if people have a chance to get a trustworthy job, they ought to take the job rather than looking for another job that could be more filling. In my opinion, I believe that if there is a better job opportunity, people may wait to get it, in particular in terms of salary and career building.
On the one hand, the salary is, maybe, one of the most important values in a satisfying job. Salary is a monthly revenue according to work hours in a month's days. Thanks to high revenue, one can be more adaptive to the job, including happiness, without feeling upset. For example, working in a place which you are not feeling good about the job because of low payments, especially if compared with other companies' same department you are working, it is a well-known fact that this situation creates dissatisfaction. Any kind of quick decision-making process in life does not mean that it was a good choice. As a result, a person who is looking for a job needs to be patient until he meets his requirements.
In addition to the salary, career-building is another noteworthy reason. Career is the process of working in order to be better than now in the future. Owing to having this, one wants to develop himself. For instance, an assistant with good qualified, no matter if he is working at a secure job or not, can wait until he found a suitable workplace for his profession. He should aware of which job is the most efficient for his career. As a consequence, waiting for the right time makes an easier professional life.
In a nutshell, when all the specific reasons and relevant examples are considered and evaluated that the expectation to choose a job rather than taking a job immediately is much more comforting.</span><br>
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children than to spend money on universities 76
- Tpo 27 80
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, may, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in particular, kind of, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78964401294 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21921733496 2.5805825403 125% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572815533981 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3308570903 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333330835093 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966049293054 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076074232363 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210955771376 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570395010286 0.0443174109184 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.