integrated essay
The article introduces a topic of the "Online graduate degree program". More specifically, the author discusses the key aspects that they are different from traditional campus environment programs. The lecturer in the listening passage disagrees and he believes that both programs are similar and attacks each of the claims made in the reading.
In the reading, the writer begins by stating that one-on-one with the professor is not possible in the online degree program. The lecturer, however, refutes this point by saying that one-on-one is up to the student, if the student wants, they often do it through emails, chats and telephone conferences. Whereas, in traditional programs, this happens through face-to-face.
The author also claims that online programs are not as challenging as on-campus programs. The lecturer thinks that there is a flaw in this point. He argues that online-programs are indeed difficult, needs a lot of concentration and strong time management skills. He goes on and says that there are programs that weigh up to 20 credits.
The last reason the author mentions that top schools do not offer online degree programs but, the professor refutes this point by saying that every ivy league schools provide online programs, only a few require a one-time residency requirement. Even Princeton has started online programs to its students.
To sum up, both the author and the professor have conflicting views and they will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... More specifically, the writer discusses .The lecturer in the listening passage di...
^^
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ore specifically, the writer discusses .The lecturer in the listening passage disag...
^^^
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... disagrees. He believes that and attacks each of the claims made in the reading. ...
^^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ims made in the reading. In the reading,the author begins by stating that.The lectu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ading,the author begins by stating that.The lecturer, however,refutes.He states tha...
^^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , refutes
...ns by stating that.The lecturer, however,refutes.He states that. He goes on to say that....
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: He
...ting that.The lecturer, however,refutes.He states that. He goes on to say that. T...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 30.3222958057 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 595.0 1373.03311258 43% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 112.0 270.72406181 41% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3125 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.2531531234 4.04702891845 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75207192356 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 145.348785872 50% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.651785714286 0.540411800872 121% => OK
syllable_count: 171.9 419.366225166 41% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 9.0 21.2450331126 42% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3133479572 49.2860985944 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 49.5833333333 110.228320801 45% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 9.33333333333 21.698381199 43% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 7.06452816374 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.565872104968 0.272083759551 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165233393921 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132147494537 0.0662205650399 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246615556186 0.162205337803 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169649472696 0.0443174109184 383% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.3589403974 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.8 53.8541721854 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 11.0289183223 51% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.74 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 63.6247240618 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 3.5 10.7273730684 33% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 5.6 10.498013245 53% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 6.0 11.2008830022 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 40.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 12.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.