The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The most innovative ideas may rise from various foundations such as one's imagination or a prolonged interest in a certain topic. Although some best ideas do require a continued interest and thought about the subject, passion simply isn't enough to make ingenious discoveries. The collaboration of love and passion for a subject with a profound knowledge is necessary for a new finding, especially in the fields of science.
First of all, without interest about certain discipline in science, it would be impossible to capture the details that other may overlook. For instance, if Einstein have not had any interest in the way light travels and did not give much thought about it in a daily basis, he would not have been able to discover special relativity because without prolonged thinking, special relativity is too complicated a concept to grasp in just a few seconds. It is because of his constant thinking about the subject that enabled Einstein to postulate the constant speed of light and make the discovery of the magnificent theory. Another example would be the discovery of penicillin. Even though it seems at first glance that Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin by fortune, it really was his constant thought about discovering the medicine that enabled him to discover the drug. Without the willingness to discover a new type of pharmaceutical, the disappearance of germs would have been easily overlooked. Consequently, without a deep interest many of the revolutionary discoveries would have not been made.
Nevertheless, it is also important to underscore the importance of knowledge to be in the center of some revolutionary discovery. Einstein without his background knowledge of physics and math, would not have been able to work out the complicated theory of special relativity let alone ponder about the speed of light. Similarly, Fleming without his deep understanding of medicine, he would not have been even able to dream about finding new drugs. Instead, he would have just tried to prescribe existent drugs to patients without giving much thought. Hence, it could be argued that some background knowledge alloyed with the incessant delving of the discipline may lead to some extraordinary discovery.
All in all, both the ability to focus on a certain subject and the assumption that the individual had received some extent of education is necessary to the formation of new findings in the scientific world. If one of them lacks in quality or quantity, the possibility of discovery will be likely to plummet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-25 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 54 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | hhj | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
- Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They 69
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
- Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.Write a response in which you disc 66
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 58
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...y rise from various foundations such as ones imagination or a prolonged interest in ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ought about the subject, passion simply isnt enough to make ingenious discoveries. T...
^^^^
Line 1, column 334, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'profound knowledge'.
Suggestion: profound knowledge
... of love and passion for a subject with a profound knowledge is necessary for a new finding, especia...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, hence, if, look, may, nevertheless, really, second, similarly, so, for instance, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21951219512 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97167272532 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490243902439 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6458874059 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.882352941 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1176470588 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0500992497862 0.243740707755 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0191391093059 0.0831039109588 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0274735793131 0.0758088955206 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0413836380034 0.150359130593 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487464590207 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.