The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools humans made.
The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.The statement is totally correct in my opinion. Although, some people will argue against it and tell that the machines are more powerful compared to the humans, but these arguments are not at all convincing.
First of all, we should take a look in the history. When and why were the machines invented? What was the specific reasons behind rise any machine or tool. If we take a retrospect, we will come to know that the solo reason behind the birth of machines is the necessity humans faced during some particular time period. Mankind started making and using tools, because they wanted to make their lives easy and fast. So, the abilities of these machines to perform tasks faster and in a reliable way is only ensured by the human engineers.
Secondly, we should always keep in mind that the power or ability we find today in machines, is simply a product of some engineer minds. The engineers are responsible for giving that abilities to perform certain tasks. The machines themselves can do nothing, other then following a human-written algorithms and codes. The machines don't have the ability to rethink and innovate. All, they can do is to keep doing the things relentlessly and sticking to the specific task. Machines can never gather power to think out of box or reproduce a similar machine.
Let us consider some examples. Can a coffee machine make coffee that is not programmed by the manufacturer. Can a broken machine repair itself at it's own. Can a driver less vehicle decide whom to save first among a living thing and a nonliving entity? The answer is simply no. Because, the machines do not have emotions. They don't have the power to judge the things they are not programmed for. But, humans can and that is the reason why humans will always be better choice when it comes to decision making and innovating.
However, a new branch in the technology is rising these days called, artificial intelligence. This concept is highly debated among the scientists because it looks really specious. The idea to make the machines so powerful that they can think, observe and learn by their own. The AI and machine learning enables computers to behave like humans and also take some decisions behalf of them. Scientists and engineers should keep such ideas in their control to make sure that no unwanted results arise.
In sum, I believe that, as long as current situation is considered, the machines can never overcome human intelligence and powers. At the same time we should keep their powers under control and not give them unnecessary freedom. Hence we can conclude that machines are not going to beat human race at least in nearest future, and even if they do so, the reason behind that will be the human ourselves.
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the president of Humana University 63
- Educators should base their assessment of students' learning not on students' grasps of facts but on the ability to explain the ideas, trend, and concepts that those facts illustrate. 58
- Following appeared in a memo from the president of Bower Buildings: 58
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times and places. 100
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times and places. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... machines are only tools of human minds.The statement is totally correct in my opin...
^^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a reliable way" with adverb for "reliable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...se machines to perform tasks faster and in a reliable way is only ensured by the human engineers....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 536, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is only ensured by the human engineers. Secondly, we should always keep in mind ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 260, Rule ID: OTHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'other than'?
Suggestion: other than
...The machines themselves can do nothing, other then following a human-written algorithms an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 266, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...chines themselves can do nothing, other then following a human-written algorithms an...
^^^^
Line 9, column 319, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...g a human-written algorithms and codes. The machines dont have the ability to rethi...
^^^
Line 9, column 332, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tten algorithms and codes. The machines dont have the ability to rethink and innovat...
^^^^
Line 9, column 556, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of box or reproduce a similar machine. Let us consider some examples. Can a cof...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 156, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...roken machine repair itself at its own. Can a driver less vehicle decide whom to sa...
^^^
Line 13, column 278, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...living entity? The answer is simply no. Because, the machines do not have emotions. The...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 327, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the machines do not have emotions. They dont have the power to judge the things they...
^^^^
Line 17, column 363, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'decisions'' or 'decision's'?
Suggestion: decisions'; decision's
...o behave like humans and also take some decisions behalf of them. Scientists and engineer...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 230, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... and not give them unnecessary freedom. Hence we can conclude that machines are not g...
^^^^^
Line 21, column 308, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the nearest'.
Suggestion: in the nearest
...e not going to beat human race at least in nearest future, and even if they do so, the rea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, then, at least, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2365.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 487.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85626283368 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48412437969 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509240246407 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 747.9 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6777139391 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8333333333 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2333333333 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413526796418 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103851929332 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133537785055 0.0758088955206 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253329215365 0.150359130593 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139281677609 0.0667264976115 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 14.1392134831 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.