The graph shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. (link below) :
https://scontent.fhph1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.15752-9/82980646_1210659309…
The line chart illustrates various polluting materials in the UK between the year 1999 and 2005.
As can be seen from the chart, the total amount of pollutants decreased, which is right for those in industry and households. Meanwhile, transport pollutants witnessed a slight growth during the period shown.
From 1990 to 1999, the total amount of air pollutants dropped sharply from 7 to 4 million tonnes. Despite the slow trend, the last years still saw a slight decrease to under 3 million tonnes in 2005.
The figures for industrial pollutants were on the dramatic decline until the end of the period, to 2 million tonnes in 2005. By contrast, there were no significant differences in the contaminants from transport in the whole period, at approximately 1 million tonnes. Meanwhile, the amount of air pollutants from households remained almost unchanged in the first 3 years. However, this was no longer exist in the last years, which was followed by a gentle rise, and then fell consistently to nearly the bottom in the ending year of the period.
- Many universities students live with their families, while others live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages ? 78
- The graph shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. (link below) : https://scontent.fhph1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.15752-9/82980646_12106593093... 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line chart illustrates various pollu...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he UK between the year 1999 and 2005. As can be seen from the chart, the total...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...light growth during the period shown. From 1990 to 1999, the total amount of a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se to under 3 million tonnes in 2005. The figures for industrial pollutants we...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 551, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ottom in the ending year of the period.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97740112994 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77401705271 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593220338983 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0431740304 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8888888889 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154511923093 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715339549276 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489405866762 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101633779601 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251128612139 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.