Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football. Other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, people have different viewpoints about which type of sports is better for them to join in. While there are numerous vote for team sports. I would argue that taking part in individual sports is a better choice.
On the one hand, the option to play team sports are advantageous to some extent. Firstly, playing team sports requires participants to corporate with other teamates, which will enable them to be better at teamwork skills. For instance, when playing in a football match, all the players must try together to put the ball into the net. This process is quite similar to the process in any coporations, when all the individuals are required to handle tasks together to achieve the company’s objectives. Secondly, team sports will give you great chances to meat a lot of people,expand their networks and make friends with many business partners that they wouldn’t have chances before which is highly beneficial for them in their future career.
On the other hand, I believe it is better to play sports individually. One reason is that this will help people to foster their independence instead on relying on others. For instance, when taking part in swimming competition, people should depend on their own strength to outsmart their opponents, and this will help them to learn how to overcome many obstacles in life by themselves. Furthermore, when playing sports alone, it is easier for them to maintain their training schedule because only themselves are aware of their own strength and limited and this will help them to avoid overexertion, which is typically happens when playing in team sports.
In conclusion, while we cannot deny the benefits that the team sports give to the players. I believe that people should try individual sports to develop their inner skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | buihieu2705 | 73 | view |
- the bar chart estimated maximum population of asian elephants 72
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 73
- US government expenditure on research 78
- Finding job satisfaction is considered to be a luxury in many developing countries Some people think that job satisfaction is more important than job security Others think that people cannot expect to enjoy a job and having a permanent job is more importa 84
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football. Other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'votes'?
Suggestion: votes
...em to join in. While there are numerous vote for team sports. I would argue that tak...
^^^^
Line 3, column 578, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , expand
...ou great chances to meat a lot of people,expand their networks and make friends with ma...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10101010101 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69695078115 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3366883046 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.214285714 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242366309363 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101781697625 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727103256469 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168738492302 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393374991536 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.