The only way to improve safety on our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences. To what degree do you agree or disagree?
These days, road accidents have become a pressing issue in urban areas. Some believe that applying more rigorous punishments to those who violate the driving rules is the only effective solution to tackle the problem, thereby improve the road traffic safety. From my point of view, I partly concur with this.
On the one hand, it is unquestionable that setting stringent penal rules could significantly secure safety for road commuters. This is because if the critical punishments are executed, the commuters will make every effort to comply with the rules. For instance, it is known that an excessive number of road accidents were instigated by overconsumption of alcoholics for years; however, since a high financial fine is used to penalize drunk drivers, people start to consume less and less alcohols and wine, thus considerably alleviate the situation. Conversely, had it not been for punishments for breaking the traffic rules, more accidents would have happened due to the misbehavior of people commuting on the road.
Nevertheless, implementing punishments should not be the only solution to maintain safe commute. In fact, there are a myriad of measures that could be taken to increase the level of road safety. Improving the quality of infrastructures, such as road and bridge, and organizing education programs providing guidelines to drive safely are such wonderful ideas that can ensure safe drives for members in the society when combined with appropriate penal regime.
All in all, although heavy punishment is evidently a potent measure to improve secure safety, a multitude of other measures are also required to maximize the level of safety for those travelling on road.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-05 | tranhien297 | 78 | view |
- Prompt Nowadays some people think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Does stricter punishment improve safety on our roads 78
- Prompt Nowadays some people think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Most people accept that we now live in a globalised world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial To what extent is globalisation a positive or negative development 81
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun alcohols is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ivers, people start to consume less and less alcohols and wine, thus considerably al...
^^^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...tain safe commute. In fact, there are a myriad of measures that could be taken to incr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, for instance, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31598513011 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88644414776 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628252788104 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.6706652989 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216692443021 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766816841216 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439058271943 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128859693823 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00476843729795 0.056905535591 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.