The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994-98.
The second chart shows their destinations over the same period.
The table demonstrates the number of people visited overseas countries between 1994 to 1998 over 100,000 people asked in the survey and their main purpose for that trip. Besides, their specific destinations during those five years are depicted in the second bar chart below.
Overall, according to both charts, the number of abroad travelers was increasing after each year and Western Europe attracted most visitors.
With regard to the table, there was an upward trend in the amount of UK residents traveled abroad in that period. Even it experienced a slight decrease of nearly 500 people in the total abroad travelers from 1994 to 1995, that number increased gradually over the next 4 years and reach a peak of 28,828 people. Among them, the majority visiting purpose was a holiday which accounted for 15,246 people in 1994 and was almost 5 times in comparison to the second reason-Business. Stay on the last order was other reasons for only 982 people in 1994 and kept fluctuating till 1998.
As we can see in the bar chart, Western Europe was the familiar destination for most UK residents when they travel overseas with approximately 19000 visitors in 1994. Similar to the trend of the total abroad travelers, in 1995, the visitors to Western Europe declined slenderly and then went up and peaked at nearly 25000 in 1998. The last rank belonged to North America with a stable upward trend from about 1000 to 2000 UK visitors after 5 years.
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the total number of Olympic medals won by twelve different countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comp
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, second, so, then, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91463414634 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50574394673 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581300813008 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3880550528 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.9 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259394083088 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984895054198 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617172161556 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149066234203 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755200040267 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.