Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television, however, television cannot replace the book as a learning tool, which is why children are less well-educated today. To what extent do you agree with this statement.
In the contemporary world has technology-focused society and every movement, new inventions are becoming more and more while television is played a vital role in modern life. So it is said that children are less well-educated in modern society as a result of watching tv on behalf of reading books. Actually, it is entirely straightforward and I strongly agree with this assertion.
To begin with, I glad to say, I have a plethora of reasons for positively this statement. Firstly, reading books is an essential thing every children life because they can get numerous information and knowledge through various books such as educated, biography and translated so on. Some expert said that reading is completed every person. In the past time, most of the offsprings spent their time with books, consequently, their IQ level was climbed rapidly. But now, students are wasted their valuable time in front of the television which is called an idiot box. For instance, Many tv channels telecast cartoons, movies and not educated programmes that mean those pragrammes are not suitable to children aged. Watching cartoons while offsprings had been created dream world their mind like cartoon animation then they try to spend their life like cartoon with various heros which is directly effected offspring's life and their future.
In addition, few tv channels telecast some education related programmes but children do not like to involve that programmes because they have motivated any other programmes such as reality programmes, music and dance competitions. Those were brought student's mind and thoughts aside from studying while they could be reached less well-educated level easily. By this, the IQ level of children went down and their life and future all are covered dark smoke.
To recapitulate, considering the above paragraphs, It would seem that using television that means spending most of the time television rather than study hours definitely children can achieve their law level intelligence.
- The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 78
- The table below give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in European countries 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household the second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which results from this energy use 44
- The map below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development 78
- Every year language die out. some people think that this is not important. Because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 347, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...ading is completed every person. In the past time, most of the offsprings spent their tim...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 844, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mation then they try to spend their life like cartoon with various heros which is...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, so, then, well, while, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 5.60731707317 517% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 965.302439024 175% => OK
No of words: 317.0 196.424390244 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31861198738 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85867431302 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 106.607317073 176% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593059936909 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 283.868780488 182% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1626537374 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.428571429 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 5.23603664747 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238700331036 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799306745585 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041119252741 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147422805159 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199217064781 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 40.7170731707 201% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.