People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to modern buildings. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There are few old buildings which have much history and are the tourist attractions in different countries. In my view reduction of all old buildings is not at all correct. Developing modern buildings is better but not by collapsing olden ones. In my perception, I do not agree with the argument and I have my reasons explained in following essay.
On one hand, many people are there who are interested towards old buildings. Nowadays, even old buildings are getting renovated at its comfort depending on the individuals. It does not mean knock down the ancient building but changing its appearance with modern technology. Indirectly, it also saves spending amount for people. At the same time, in olden days buildings are constructed very strongly which are good in condition even after many environmental hazards.
On the other hand, it is acceptable that modern constructions have different advantages. Accordingly, these can be constructed in a new place rather than by destructing the old one. At the same time, in these day’s buildings are even getting constructed with different materials like concrete, glass, wood and so on. However, some people are habituated with their comfort in olden homes. One suddenly can’t adjust to the modern developments and change their regular habits.
After having considered all the points that has discussed above, we can finally draw a conclusion that, there are many other ways to manage with old buildings. One can also go with those than collapsing the old buildings and to construct the modern buildings is meaningless. Also, this leads waste of money and time. Indeed, one can construct new one in a different place. Along with it, we can also change the appearance of ancient construction without destructing it completely.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-15 | saipriyanka | 61 | view |
- Scientists have been warning from many years about environmental protection and we should limit the use of energy in daily lives What are the reasons for that How to encourage people to take an interest towards environment protection 78
- Some people think the government is wasting money on science and this money could better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Scientists have been warning from many years about environmental protection and we should limit the use of energy in daily lives What are the reasons for that How to encourage people to take an interest towards environment protection 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
- Children brought up in families with less money are better prepared for life than those from wealthy families To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons and include example 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this day' or 'these days'?
Suggestion: this day; these days
...cting the old one. At the same time, in these day’s buildings are even getting constructe...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, however, if, so, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19444444444 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88834630321 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538194444444 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0371884001 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.7368421053 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1578947368 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223085210927 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734639868213 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602212628651 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14888458588 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469112777273 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.23 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.