The use of mobile phone is as anti-social as smoking. Since smoking is banned in certain places, using mobile phone should be banned as well. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, as technological improvements attract people with advanced tools and making them always busy with their mobile phones. Many masses think mobile should be banned at some places like smoking and make it as anti-social. As, they emit more radiations which are unhealthy and causes mental issues. In my view, I partially agree to this argument and I believe that the existence of mobile phones has many benefits in the recent days. I will explain my stand in the following passage.
On the one hand, comparing the usage of mobile phones with respect to smoking is meaningless. Because, smoking has many effects on human life. Actually, smoking not only harms the person who smokes but also the people around them will get affected. While coming to mobiles, those are not that harm to human and it has many more benefits. In contrast, the main drawback in mobiles is its radiations. At the same time, if it is watched for more time, eyes get effected and have some side effects to brain. Mostly, mobile phones are prohibited in areas like historical places, temples and so on. That too for security purposes.
On the other hand, mobile phones are easily accessible, and they are most reliable. Moreover, irrespective to the age everyone is using mobiles as a source of information and entertainment. However, one can gain information about anything in the world and learn about different cultures of various countries. At the same time, mobiles are helpful to communicate with others wherever they may be in the world.
After having considered all the above discussed points, we can finally draw a conclusion that using mobile phones is not anti-social like smoking because it does not have effects on others while it is used by themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-02 | saipriyanka | 78 | view |
- Some people feel that entertainers e g film stars pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money Do you agree or disagree Which other types of job should be highly paid 61
- Scientists have been warning from many years about environmental protection and we should limit the use of energy in daily lives What are the reasons for that How to encourage people to take an interest towards environment protection 78
- You will move to a new city for work You know some people who live there Write a letter to your friend In your letter ask them for help finding an accommodation tell them where you would like to live tell them the type of place you are looking for Write a 56
- When a country develops its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out It is pointless to try and keep them alive 84
- The best way to improve health is to exercise daily To what extent do you agree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lain my stand in the following passage. On the one hand, comparing the usage of ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...with respect to smoking is meaningless. Because, smoking has many effects on human life...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...ly harms the person who smokes but also the people around them will get affected. While coming to mobi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, in contrast, in my view, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00341296928 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62842955351 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58361774744 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3763544664 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4444444444 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2777777778 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332128849225 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911599891874 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905572233863 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195626121452 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397953269184 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.