People in community now could buy cheaper consumer goods. Do the advantages outweight the disadvantages?
The cheaper consumer goods could be bought by individuals in society today. It is believed that downside of using these stuff are manifold upside.
There is a number of downside accruing to cheaper products. To beign with, using low-priced goods cause that get out faster than the products which are good quality and that remain in the cycle of consumption in a short time. Take some clothes which is needed by people such as shoes as an example; these shoes may be breakdown and people have to buy another one so they purchase two low quality with half price inspide of get one shoes with high feature that would be more practical. On the other hand this product is more likely to hurt their body. Put it simply, inexpensive products lay the groundwork for the emergence of many problems that their body face with enormous trouble in the feature. A good illustration of this is these shoes may hurt their feet in long time and change to a big pain in their back. So it seems that they lose their time, money and numerous unmangeable just with purchasing inappropriate wares.
On the plus side, the upside of consuming affordable things should not be ignored. The most axiomatic argument s consider that they can save a huge amount of money for other things that they may need in the future. Simply put, when people buy cheaper stuff that are as much quality as expensive products, they can rescue their budget for valuable goods. A good illustration reasonable cell phone which is the same grade as an example; that can help them expend their accounts for necessary stuff such as standard shoes.
To conclude, it is generally assumed that cheaper shopper goods might have many drawbacks for everyone. While these products with low quality not only use for a little time and it is more likely to supplant with another one and especially they are bound to put their health in jeopardy insipde of benefits may help them spend their budget for required products.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There is a number of downside accruing t...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...the cycle of consumption in a short time . Take some clothes which is needed by pe...
^^
Line 2, column 490, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...igh feature that would be more practical . On the other hand these product are mor...
^^
Line 2, column 511, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this product' or 'these products'?
Suggestion: this product; these products
...d be more practical . On the other hand these product are more likely to hurt their body. Put...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 708, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ace with enormous trouble in the feature . A good illustration of this is these sh...
^^
Line 2, column 825, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e and change to a big pain in their back . So it seems that they lose their time, ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t with purchasing inappropriate wares. On the plus side, the upside of consumin...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...re as much quality as expensive products , they can rescue their budget for valuab...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecessary stuff such as standard shoes. To conclude, it is generally assumed tha...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, so, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73186119874 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40225772437 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542586750789 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3086734614 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.384615385 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134716510787 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587590682719 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437376624753 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943482312172 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151715679069 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.